2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2004.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection*1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
337
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 546 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
337
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the state-of-the-art methods need to segment at least the lesion (excepting [7]). While this could be a limitation in some complex cases with infiltrating tumors or presence of edema, there exist automated methods that allow an accurate segmentation of a large range of lesions [16][17][18] (see [19] for a recent review of brain tumor segmentation algorithms). Voxel-based methods naturally avoid the problem of presegmenting functionally important brain structures (excepting the lesion) since they directly work on voxel intensities.…”
Section: Survey Of Registration Methods For Brain Mr Images With Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the state-of-the-art methods need to segment at least the lesion (excepting [7]). While this could be a limitation in some complex cases with infiltrating tumors or presence of edema, there exist automated methods that allow an accurate segmentation of a large range of lesions [16][17][18] (see [19] for a recent review of brain tumor segmentation algorithms). Voxel-based methods naturally avoid the problem of presegmenting functionally important brain structures (excepting the lesion) since they directly work on voxel intensities.…”
Section: Survey Of Registration Methods For Brain Mr Images With Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we note that a direct comparison is difficult due to different data, manual raters, and others. The Jaccard scores for Clark et al [4] are about 70%, for Prastawa et al [7] are 80% (both on very limited datasets with seven and three patients respectively), and Corso et al [5] is 85% (on training data with of five cases) The extended graph-shifts algorithm is also the fastest among these taking about a minute to perform the segmentation on each of these scans (preprocessing takes about five minutes). We show some examples in figure 5.…”
Section: Segmenting Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From the computer vision perspective, the task is to label regions of an image into pathological and non-pathological components. This is a special case of the well-known image segmentation problem which has a large literature in computer vision [1,2,3] and medical imaging [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] In previous work [11], we developed a hierarchical algorithm called graph-shifts which we applied to the task of segmenting sub-cortical structures formulated as energy function minimization. The algorithm does energy minimization by iteratively transforming the hierarchical graph representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Region growing [19] based tumor detection techniques suffer high time complexity. Statistical pattern recognition based methods [13], [21], [23] fall short, partly because large deformations occur in the intracranial tissues due to the growth of the tumor and edema. These methods detect abnormal regions using a registered brain atlas as a model for healthy brains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%