2016
DOI: 10.1038/nature20118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A brain–spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates

Abstract: Spinal cord injury disrupts the communication between the brain and the spinal circuits that orchestrate movement. To bypass the lesion, brain–computer interfaces1–3 have directly linked cortical activity to electrical stimulation of muscles, which have restored grasping abilities after hand paralysis1,4. Theoretically, this strategy could also restore control over leg muscle activity for walking5. However, replicating the complex sequence of individual muscle activation patterns underlying natural and adaptiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
451
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 529 publications
(486 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
451
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…There was evidence to support the NT‐3‐induced spinal circuitry plasticity to affect the changes necessary to promote the locomotor improvements. In a mature neuronal circuit, it is easy to establish the voluntary muscular contraction on one side of the organization by producing communication in the contralateral corticospinal motor pathway 48, 49, 50. With four canines in each group, we tested their CMEPs, and compared them with the CMEP before injury, 1 week and 4 weeks after graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was evidence to support the NT‐3‐induced spinal circuitry plasticity to affect the changes necessary to promote the locomotor improvements. In a mature neuronal circuit, it is easy to establish the voluntary muscular contraction on one side of the organization by producing communication in the contralateral corticospinal motor pathway 48, 49, 50. With four canines in each group, we tested their CMEPs, and compared them with the CMEP before injury, 1 week and 4 weeks after graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of NIT in the CNS applications, glial scar‐free neural recordings have been achieved using ultraflexible probes in the brains of rodents 10. Furthermore, the brain–spine interface was able to support the locomotion of monkeys using a multimodal neural interface, called e‐dura 11, 12…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FES is typically associated with electrical stimulation of muscles directly or through nerve stimulation. However, several groups have used brain-controlled electrical intraspinal [61] or epidural spinal [62] stimulation in NHPs for grasping and hindlimb locomotion, respectively. This mode of stimulation elicits muscle activation patterns either directly by stimulating pools of alpha motorneurons or indirectly by inducing motor patterns through interneurons following stimulation of dorsal roots.…”
Section: Comparison With Spinal Electrical Stimulation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%