2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-001-0268-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary point interpolation method for stress analysis of solids

Abstract: A boundary point interpolation method (BPIM) is proposed for solving boundary value problems of solid mechanics. In the BPIM, the boundary of a problem domain is represented by properly scattered nodes. The boundary integral equation (BIE) for 2-D elastostatics has been discretized using point interpolants based only on a group of arbitrarily distributed boundary points. In the present BPIM formulation, the shape functions constructed using polynomial basis function in a curvilinear coordinate possess Dirac de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meshless (mesh-free) methods have been developed in the past decades to reduce the required effort for mesh generation. Many meshless methods have been proposed thus far, including the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method [6,7], the reproducing kernel particle methods (RKPM) [8], the hpclouds method [9], the element-free Galerkin method (EFG) [10], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach [11], the boundary node method (BNM) [12][13][14], the boundary element-free method (BEFM) [15], the hybrid boundary node method (hybrid BNM) [16][17][18][19][20], the Galerkin boundary node method (GBNM) [21], the boundary face method (BFM) [22,23], and the boundary point interpolation method [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless (mesh-free) methods have been developed in the past decades to reduce the required effort for mesh generation. Many meshless methods have been proposed thus far, including the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method [6,7], the reproducing kernel particle methods (RKPM) [8], the hpclouds method [9], the element-free Galerkin method (EFG) [10], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) approach [11], the boundary node method (BNM) [12][13][14], the boundary element-free method (BEFM) [15], the hybrid boundary node method (hybrid BNM) [16][17][18][19][20], the Galerkin boundary node method (GBNM) [21], the boundary face method (BFM) [22,23], and the boundary point interpolation method [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attractive alternative is to combine meshless techniques (see References [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and other references in these papers) with boundary integral formulations to alleviate meshing requirements. Boundary-type methods [17,18] that combine boundary integral formulations with meshless techniques have been developed. We have recently introduced a boundary cloud method (BCM) [19] that also combines boundary integral formulations with meshless techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weight function derivatives with respect to the spatial coordinates are also required for the shape function derivatives as given in Equation (14) and are given as follows [2]:…”
Section: Weight Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past few decades, a variety of new meshless methods have been developed, including the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method [4], the finite point method (FPM) [5], the diffuse element method (DEM) [6], the element free Galerkin (EFG) method [7], the point interpolation method (PIM) [8], the hp clouds method [9], the partition of unity method (PUM) [10], the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method [11], the local point interpolation method (LPIM) [12], the discrete least squares meshless (DLSM) method [13], the boundary point interpolation method (BPIM) [14], and the meshless method with boundary integral equations [15]- [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%