2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-013-1150-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary element model for acoustic responses in the ear canal and its statistical validation and updating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A notable SA study was conducted by Lee and Ahn [311] who employed BEM simulations ran with Synoise 5.6 to validate wave-based HRTFs against some conducted measurements. [311] studied the following factors: impedance (i.e., hair, skin, tympanic membrane), exact source location, exact receiver location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A notable SA study was conducted by Lee and Ahn [311] who employed BEM simulations ran with Synoise 5.6 to validate wave-based HRTFs against some conducted measurements. [311] studied the following factors: impedance (i.e., hair, skin, tympanic membrane), exact source location, exact receiver location.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable SA study was conducted by Lee and Ahn [311] who employed BEM simulations ran with Synoise 5.6 to validate wave-based HRTFs against some conducted measurements. [311] studied the following factors: impedance (i.e., hair, skin, tympanic membrane), exact source location, exact receiver location. Given the rather large errors in the acquired measurements, [311] concludes that the studied factors cannot account for all the mismatch with the measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this disagreement in the UDTF in high frequency regions are uncertain: they could originate from FE model errors, uncertainties of the material properties, and/or experimental errors as discussed in Ref. [18]. In order to assess the FE model appropriately, these errors and the variability of the UDTF due to the input uncertainties of the numerical model must be quantified.…”
Section: Finite Element (Fe) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model calibration or updating process for a numerical model is a primary concern of numerous researchers regardless of whether the calibration is undertaken before the validation [15] or is included in the validation process [18]. The calibration process has been established overall, but for the detailed view there are numerous different strategies because there are numerous situations between a numerical model and the available experimental data in various areas.…”
Section: Statistical Calibration Of the Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation