1995
DOI: 10.1016/0955-7997(95)00025-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary element method for stress reduction by optimal auxiliary holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Providakis and Sotiropoulos [5] solved the stress concentration problem by introducing auxiliary holes in the loading direction, their results show that decreasing the distance between the original hole and the auxiliary hole can reduce the stress concentration, but at the same time increases the stress concentration at the auxiliary hole. Similar work was done by Ulrich [6] earlier to reduce the stress concentration by introducing optimally sized and placed circular holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Providakis and Sotiropoulos [5] solved the stress concentration problem by introducing auxiliary holes in the loading direction, their results show that decreasing the distance between the original hole and the auxiliary hole can reduce the stress concentration, but at the same time increases the stress concentration at the auxiliary hole. Similar work was done by Ulrich [6] earlier to reduce the stress concentration by introducing optimally sized and placed circular holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…To ensure convergence and to obtain accurate results, a gradual change in the element size is employed. Therefore, smaller elements are used near the points of stress concentrations while larger elements are utilized far Ulrich and Moslehy [9] Tension Reduces the SCF (stress concentration factor) up to 3.0 for the ellipse from the high stress areas. Also, the size of elements is decreased until changes in the results of well-known cases are less than 1 per cent.…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naik et al [8] optimized the hole shapes in beams under pure bending. Ulrich and Moslehy [9] and Providakis et al [10] used boundary element methods to reduce stress concentration in plates by introducing optimal auxiliary holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naik et al [1986] optimized the hole shapes in beams under pure bending. Povidakis [1993] and Ulrich and Moslehy [1995] used boundary element methods to reduce stress concentration in plates by introducing optimal auxiliary holes. Duchek et al [1998] have demonstrated the effectiveness of stiffeners fastened on either side of a hole or cutout in a flat plate loaded in tension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%