2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2008.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boundary element-free method (BEFM) for two-dimensional potential problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1.1) often arises as a reformulation of boundary value problems with certain nonlinear boundary conditions. Several numerical methods, such as boundary element methods, various spectral methods are available in literature to solve nonlinear integral equations (see [2,3,4,6,7,14,23]). The existence and uniqueness of the solution and convergence analysis of various spectral approximations of nonlinear systems of integral equations are conveyed in [11,22,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.1) often arises as a reformulation of boundary value problems with certain nonlinear boundary conditions. Several numerical methods, such as boundary element methods, various spectral methods are available in literature to solve nonlinear integral equations (see [2,3,4,6,7,14,23]). The existence and uniqueness of the solution and convergence analysis of various spectral approximations of nonlinear systems of integral equations are conveyed in [11,22,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element-free or mesh-free methods have been extensively researched because of its important application for solving mathematical and physical problems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; especially when the traditional computational methods are not well suited for such problems that involved extremely large deformation, dynamic fracturing or explosion problems [11]. Based on different approximation functions, various element-free or mesh-free methods were proposed, including the element-free Galerkin method [12], the hp clouds method [13], the moving least-squares differential quadrature method [14,15], the reproducing kernel particle method [16], wavelet particle method [17], the radial point interpolation method [18][19][20], the complex variable meshless method [21,22] and the meshless boundary integral equation methods [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also fewer coefficients in the improved moving least-squares approximation than there are in the MLS approximation, and hence the computing speed and efficiency have increased. Combining the boundary integral equation method with the improved moving least-squares approximation, Cheng and Liew et al [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] come up with a direct meshless boundary integral equation method, called boundary element-free method (BEFM), to solve the problems, such as potential problems, elasticity, elastodynamics, and fracture. And the improved element-free Galerkin method based on the improved moving least-squares approximation was discussed by Zhang, Liew and Cheng [21][22][23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meshless method based on the MLS approximation can generate a solution possessing great precision. The meshless boundary integral equation methods are developed by combining the MLS approximation with boundary integral equation methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The boundary node method (BNM) is one of the meshless boundary integral equation methods, and Mukherjee et al [3][4][5] used it to solve potential problems and linear elasticity problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation