2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58586-0_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Boundary Based Out-of-Distribution Classifier for Generalized Zero-Shot Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For specific OoC per class in SIXray and CIFAR-10, we observe that when using REFGAN and REFGAN BOUNDARY, classes which were misdetected using the PRIOR, now have improved performance. In the future, we will evaluate REFGAN using a large number of classes using (9) to avoid softmax [39] and compare it to [15] and meta-learning methods that address the few-shot learning setting [25], [40], [41]. In addition to fewshot OoD detection, our algorithm will also output confidence and bounding boxes around anomalies/objects within a robust integrated classification-with-OoD-detection framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For specific OoC per class in SIXray and CIFAR-10, we observe that when using REFGAN and REFGAN BOUNDARY, classes which were misdetected using the PRIOR, now have improved performance. In the future, we will evaluate REFGAN using a large number of classes using (9) to avoid softmax [39] and compare it to [15] and meta-learning methods that address the few-shot learning setting [25], [40], [41]. In addition to fewshot OoD detection, our algorithm will also output confidence and bounding boxes around anomalies/objects within a robust integrated classification-with-OoD-detection framework.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In GZSL setting, OoD samples indicate samples from unseen categories, and In-Domain (ID) samples indicate samples from seen categories. Therefore, these OoD based GZSL approaches [8] firstly try to differentiate the test sample whether it belongs to OoD samples, and then use a seen classes classifier usually Softmax for ID samples and a ZSL classifier such as ALE [2] for OoD samples respectively. Besides, Atzmon et al proposed a soft gating model which makes soft decisions if a sample is from a seen class [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct search within all classes cannot well utilized the knowledge learned from the seen training samples, thus some Out-of-Domain (OoD) based methods are proposed to first classify the feature as seen or unseen, and then divide the GZSL problem into two sub-tasks: a conventional ZSL task and a fully supervised learning task. For example, some OoD [7,8] based methods define two classifiers to handle the seen and unseen domains separately. However, they all neglected that OoD detection is also a binary zeroshot classification, so it is unsuitable to use two totally different models for OoD detection and zero-shot classification respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since only seen domain images are available during training, images from unseen categories tend to be recognized as seen categories. To this end, DVBE [31] and Boundary-based OOD [10] explore out-of-distribution detection to treat seen and unseen domains separately. Some works [28,20] suppress the seen category confidence when recognizing images to better distinguish two domain samples.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%