2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bootstrap test for time series linearity

Abstract: A bootstrap algorithm is proposed for testing Gaussianity and linearity in stationary time series, and consistency of the relevant bootstrap approximations is proven rigorously for the first time. Subba Rao and Gabr (1980) and Hinich (1982) have formulated some well-known nonparametric tests for Gaussianity and linearity based on the asymptotic distribution of the normalized bispectrum. The proposed bootstrap procedure gives an alternative way to approximate the finite-sample null distribution of such test sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conditions like (4.8)−(4.10) are standard in the context of parametric bootstraps [see for example Berg, Paparoditis, and Politis (2010) or Kreiß, Paparoditis, and Politis (2011)] and a detailed discussion of them is given in . There it is also discussed why (4.10) might hold in the general framework considered here, but a rigorous proof of such a statement is an open problem so far.…”
Section: The Estimate In (D) Also Holds If the Null Hypothesis (37) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditions like (4.8)−(4.10) are standard in the context of parametric bootstraps [see for example Berg, Paparoditis, and Politis (2010) or Kreiß, Paparoditis, and Politis (2011)] and a detailed discussion of them is given in . There it is also discussed why (4.10) might hold in the general framework considered here, but a rigorous proof of such a statement is an open problem so far.…”
Section: The Estimate In (D) Also Holds If the Null Hypothesis (37) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely we will now develop a bootstrap procedure, which is closely related to the one dimensional AR(∞) bootstrap introduced by Kreiss (1988). This methodology has found considerable attention in the recent literature [see Choi and Hall (2000), Goncalves and Kilian (2007) or Berg et al (2010) among others] since it is easy to implement but has sufficient complexity to capture the predominant dependencies in the underlying process. In the present context it will yield critical values such that a test for structural breaks based on the statisticD T is directly implementable.…”
Section: Testing For Structural Breaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that all assumptions of Theorems 3.5 and 3.6 are rather standard in the framework of AR(∞) bootstrap [see for example Berg et al (2010) or Kreiss et al (2011) among others]…”
Section: Testing For Structural Breaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section A.1.1, we establish (3.11), thus completing (but for Lemmas A.1-A.3) the proof of Theorem 3.1. In Section A.1.2, we state and prove Lemmas A.1-A 3,. which completes the proof of (3.9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%