2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A boosting approach to forecasting the volatility of gold-price fluctuations under flexible loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, large number of studies have looked into forecasting not only the daily conditional volatilities of gold and oil based on univariate and multivariate models from the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) family, but over the last decade, a burgeoning literature has focused on predicting realized volatility derived from intraday data, 1 using the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR)-type model of Corsi (2009) (see for example, Pierdzioch, Risse, and Rohloff (2016), Degiannakis and Filis (2017), and Fang, Honghai, and Xiao (2018) for detailed reviews). Against this backdrop, given the evidence of significant volatility spillovers across the gold and oil markets, and the importance of geopolitical risks for asset markets (Car-ney, 2016), the objective of this paper is to forecast both the volatilities and co-volatility of the two most-traded commodities by incorporating the role of spillovers and geopolitical risks into the model specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, large number of studies have looked into forecasting not only the daily conditional volatilities of gold and oil based on univariate and multivariate models from the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) family, but over the last decade, a burgeoning literature has focused on predicting realized volatility derived from intraday data, 1 using the Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR)-type model of Corsi (2009) (see for example, Pierdzioch, Risse, and Rohloff (2016), Degiannakis and Filis (2017), and Fang, Honghai, and Xiao (2018) for detailed reviews). Against this backdrop, given the evidence of significant volatility spillovers across the gold and oil markets, and the importance of geopolitical risks for asset markets (Car-ney, 2016), the objective of this paper is to forecast both the volatilities and co-volatility of the two most-traded commodities by incorporating the role of spillovers and geopolitical risks into the model specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understandably, an accurate forecast of gold return volatility is of paramount interest to investors and portfolio managers in their asset pricing models (such as, gold derivatives pricing) as well as in hedging strategies to mitigate portfolio risks. Not surprisingly, there exists a large amount of literature on empirical finance that aims to forecast gold volatility based on various metrics that capture the uncertain environment of the financial markets and macroeconomy (see for example, Pierdzioch et al (2016), Fang et al, (2018), Asai et al (2019, forthcoming), Bouri and Jalkh (2019), Demirer et al (2019), , Bonato et al, (forthcoming b), and the references cited therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third strand of research focuses on the properties of the realized volatility of gold price fluctuations. For example, using a boosting approach, Pierdzioch et al (2016a) examine the timevarying predictive value of several financial and macroeconomic variables for out-of-sample forecasting the monthly realized gold-price volatility over the sample period from 1987 to 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%