1995
DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97321-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A body-worn gait analysis system for evaluating hemiplegic gait

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We never experienced a loss of foot contact feedback in using this system with the RunBot robot or during the data collection with human participants, although a failure of the foot contact sensors could occur with potential dangerous consequences for the biped locomotion. The FSRs used in the study have a typical operation beyond 1,000,000 actuations [37] , making them suitable for use in the detection of foot contact, for which they have been used previously [25] , [26] , [38] . Future development of the system to improve robustness and fault tolerance could involve integration of internal forward models with efference copy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We never experienced a loss of foot contact feedback in using this system with the RunBot robot or during the data collection with human participants, although a failure of the foot contact sensors could occur with potential dangerous consequences for the biped locomotion. The FSRs used in the study have a typical operation beyond 1,000,000 actuations [37] , making them suitable for use in the detection of foot contact, for which they have been used previously [25] , [26] , [38] . Future development of the system to improve robustness and fault tolerance could involve integration of internal forward models with efference copy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device also incorporates amplifier circuitry for force sensing resistors (FSRs) (Interlink Electronics, Camarillo, CA, USA) for measuring foot contact information. The FSRs are embedded in standard shoe insoles at four different positions under each of the feet for recording areas of peak pressure distribution during walking (main weight bearing areas); under the first and fifth metatarsals, big toe and heel, as described by Granat et al [25] . Images of the experimental set-up can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was expressed as a percentage of continuous metatarsal contact time. A value of 100% indicated that there was no contact under the 1st metatarsal, a value of 0% indicated equal contact times between 1st and 5th metatarsal and a value of −100% indicated no contact of the 5th metatarsal [14]. Table 2 Ankle angle at the end of swing phase in each subject across various study phases compared to baseline.…”
Section: Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in stroke patients, inappropriate weight bearing on the affected side with symptom-like foot drop may cause severe problems in postural control and body alignment, as well as asymmetry and alteration of muscle activation 2 ) . As a result, walking in patients with stroke even after rehabilitation therapy may be associated with increased energy expenditure and less efficiency 3 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%