2003
DOI: 10.4324/9780203464687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Blueprint for Computer-Assisted Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
132
0
14

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
132
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Each completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding question design, student learning and operational aspects similar to that of Bull and McKenna (2003), see Table 1. The evaluation form is in appendix 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each completed an anonymous questionnaire regarding question design, student learning and operational aspects similar to that of Bull and McKenna (2003), see Table 1. The evaluation form is in appendix 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of CAA have been widely reported. These include, increased variety of assessed tasks, the provision of instantaneous feedback, as well as increased objectivity and resource saving (Bull and McKenna, 2004;Conole and Warburton, 2005;Hollingsworth, 1960). However the focus of many CAA systems tends to be on providing fully automatic assessment of student work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many reasons why CAA is so keenly adopted: it allows more frequent assessments covering more material, providing more feedback while reducing marking load -among other benefits suggested by Bull and McKenna (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%