A bleeding controversy: Duties and decisions in the face of conflicting advice

Abstract

The authors use a composite case based on their experiences to illustrate the ethics of inter-professional conflict. An HDU team receive two telephone calls. One is from the patient's cardiologist, who states that a patient must be anti-coagulated without delay. The other is from the surgeon responsible for the patient's current admission, who states that the patient must under no circumstances be anti-coagulated. We argue that in the absence of a broad understanding of the patient's condition and values, specialists should be cautious when giving categorical orders or, at the very least, should provide the rationale for their advice to help the care leader in his or her decision-making.

How do healthcare professionals manage ethical challenges regarding information in healthcare professional/patient clinical interactions? A review of concept- or argument-based articles and case analyses

“…Year Type of study Journal Agyapong et al [38] 2009 Case review/analysis J Forensic Legal Med Bahal et al [48] 2010 Case review/analysis Int J Surgery Bell et al [45] 2015 Case review/analysis Pediatrics Beng [44] 2006 Case review/analysis Malays Fam Physician Chan Smutko et al [28] 2008 Case review/analysis Oncologist Cohen et al [55] 2012 Case review/analysis J Med Ethics Faith and Chidwick [42] 2009 Case review/analysis Crit Care Nurs Fine et al [20] 2005 Case review/analysis Pediatrics Gupta et al [60] 2008 Case review/analysis J Dev Behav Pediatr Hatano et al [52] 2011 Case review/analysis J Pain Symptom Manage Hyde et al [43] 2013 Case review/analysis Dimensions Crit Care Nurs Johnson et al [14] 2006 Case review/analysis Mil Med Kasman [34] 2004 Case review/analysis J Gen Intern Med Lohiya [37] 2013 Case review/analysis J Am Coll Dent Mueller et al [22] 2004 Case review/analysis Mayo Clin Proc Offit et al [29] 2004 Case review/analysis JAMA Olsen [51] 2010 Case review/analysis Am J Nurs Reynolds et al [23] 2007 Case review/analysis Surg Clin N Am Rinehart [56] 2013 Case review/analysis Clin Jam Soc Nephrol Schneider et al [30] 2006 Case review/analysis J Genet Couns Tully et al [19] 2016 Case review/analysis AMA J Ethics Umeorah and Chukwuneke [31] 2013 Case review/analysis Ann Med Health Sci Res Westra et al [35] 2009 Case review/analysis Eur J Pediatr White and Lofwall [57] 2015 Case review/analysis J Psychiatr Res Youngner [24] 2016 Case review/analysis AMA J Ethics Kadooka et al [26] 2016 Case review/analysis Bioethics Ercan Avci [12] 2017 Case review/analysis Med Health Care Philos Battistuzzi et al [27] 2012 Concept/argument-based article Clin Genet Becker et al [10] 2015 Concept/argument-based article J Pain Symptom Manage Brown [62] 2010 Concept/argument-based article Pediatr Radiol Brown et al [59] 2016 Concept/arg...…”

“…It is believed that these experienced colleagues can provide useful insights for professionals who struggle with the above ethical difficulties. [25,34,[47][48][49][50]…”