T he incidence of sepsis and mortality rates have remained consistent over the years despite advances in therapy, with mortality rates reported to be as high as 23.6% for patients diagnosed with septic shock. 1,2 However, since 2014, how we identify sepsis and how we treat affected patients has changed substantially. 3,4 In addition, although the topic is beyond the scope of this article, controversy remains about which criteria should be used when screening for and diagnosing sepsis. 5 The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of some of the updates to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, adjustments in traditional approaches to the management of sepsis, and novel therapies that have yet to be described extensively in the literature, such as the use of ascorbic acid, thiamine, and angiotensin II. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Updates The main update in the 2016 SSC guideline recommendations was that the use of early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) did not confer a mortality benefit compared with standard of care. 6 In the important studies on which the 2016 SSC recommendations were based, the framework of EGDT was still used in the standard-of-care groups (early antibiotic administration and fluids for patients with hypotension); however, dynamic variables to assess fluid responsiveness were promoted over the use of static variables. 4 In 2018 the SSC released another update to their guidelines, recommending that fluid resuscitation and antibiotics should not be lumped into 3-and 6-hour bundles, but should be started within 1 hour of recognition of possible sepsis or septic shock. 7 However, whether this strategy should be considered a best practice remains controversial. In May 2018, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) responded by not endorsing the SSC guidelines, especially as they pertained to a strict 1-hour bundle, because of concerns that a significant percentage of patients might receive antibiotics who are not actually infected. 8 By September 2018, additional concerns had been raised related to the release of the 1-hour bundle; the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians released a joint statement advising that hospitals in the United States should not implement the 1-hour bundle