“…To this end, we compare both the scaling and magnitude of bite forces with two extensive datasets including close to 900 species, covering eight orders of magnitude in body mass and head volume [89, 90]. Regression analysis on log 10 -transformed bite force data for 203 amniote and two insect species against body mass [45, 46, 89], and for 139 amniote and 653 insect species against head volume [89, 90] suggests isometry of bite forces [mass 0.68 , OLS 95% CI: (0.65 | 0.72), R 2 = 0.86; head volume 0.68 , OLS 95% CI: (0.66 | 0.70), R 2 = 0.87, see Fig.4]. The intercepts of the regression, which reflect mass- and head-volume specific bite forces (with mass in g, volume in mm 3 , and force in N), in turn are −0.08 [mass across species: OLS 95% CI: (−0.17 | 0.01)], 1.17 [mass within A. vollenweideri: OLS 95% CI: (1.07 | 1.26), see Fig.4C], −1.49 [volume across species: OLS 95% CI: (−1.53 | −1.44)], and −1.29 [volume within A. vollenweideri: OLS 95% CI: (−1.33 | −1.25)].…”