2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.661108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bird's-Eye View of Exercise Intervention in Treating Depression Among Teenagers in the Last 20 Years: A Bibliometric Study and Visualization Analysis

Abstract: Background: Exercise is medicine. Multiple studies on the effects and mechanisms of exercise in treating depression among teenagers and adolescents have been widely reported. However, literature involving scientometric analysis of this topic is sparse. Here, we endeavored to conduct a bibliometric study and visualization analysis to give a bird's-eye view of publications between 2000 and 2020 on exercise therapy treating depression.Methods: Relevant original publications were obtained from the Science Citation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, continuous updating of the changes in the database might have led to variations between search results and the number of actual publications included. Second, considering that the WoSCC database is one of the most extensive and well-recognized global resources ( 17 , 47 ), the information on these publications was only from WoSCC, so some publications from other databases may have been missed. Third, the omission of books/chapters/letters and the consideration of articles published in English alone may have led to some biases in our analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, continuous updating of the changes in the database might have led to variations between search results and the number of actual publications included. Second, considering that the WoSCC database is one of the most extensive and well-recognized global resources ( 17 , 47 ), the information on these publications was only from WoSCC, so some publications from other databases may have been missed. Third, the omission of books/chapters/letters and the consideration of articles published in English alone may have led to some biases in our analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric analysis has emerged in various research domains ( 16 ). In contrast to traditional systematic reviews and meta-analyses, bibliometric analysis can reveal the current status and development of research topics more systematically and visually ( 17 ). Bibliometric analysis can also be used to identify current highlights and “hotspots” for researchers to generate ideas and perspectives to guide future research orientations in a particular field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid bias, all hits were retrieved as “full-record and cited-references” files from WoSCC on August 12, 2021 for further analysis. Referring to the previous pieces of research (Yan et al, 2020 ; You et al, 2021a , c ), we only selected “articles or reviews” for analysis, and the language was limited to “English”; other document types and non-English articles were excluded. The reason for setting the time range in the new century was that few publications related to AP-PE were produced before year 2001.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CiteSpace 5.8.R 2 Version (Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA), a Java-based application, was utilized to perform the bibliometric analysis on the papers, involving the analysis of publications, journals, authors, references, countries, institutions, and keywords. The CiteSpace V software, an exemplary scientometric analysis method, was utilized to conduct literature analysis ( 14 ). The arguments of CiteSpace software were set as follows: time span = 2000–2020, years per slice = 1, term source = all selection, node type = select the corresponding analysis target at a time, selection criteria = top 50, and pruning = none.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%