2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biotic index using the seagrass Posidonia oceanica (BiPo), to evaluate ecological status of coastal waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…aThe metrics of PREI are: shoot density, shoot leaf surface area, ratio between epibiota biomass and leaf biomass, depth of the lower limit and type of this limit [14].bThe metrics of POMI are: shoot density, meadow cover, percentage of plagiotropic rhizomes, shoot leaf surface area, percentage of foliar necrosis, P, N and sucrose content in rhizomes, δ 15 N and δ 34 S isotopic ratio in rhizomes, N content in epiphytes, Cu, Pb and Zn content in rhizomes [12].cThe metrics of BiPo are: shoot density, shoot leaf surface area, lower depth limit and lower limit type [15].PREI, POMI and BiPo indices are based upon distinct but similar metrics and range from 0 (lowest ecological status) to 1 (highest ecological status).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aThe metrics of PREI are: shoot density, shoot leaf surface area, ratio between epibiota biomass and leaf biomass, depth of the lower limit and type of this limit [14].bThe metrics of POMI are: shoot density, meadow cover, percentage of plagiotropic rhizomes, shoot leaf surface area, percentage of foliar necrosis, P, N and sucrose content in rhizomes, δ 15 N and δ 34 S isotopic ratio in rhizomes, N content in epiphytes, Cu, Pb and Zn content in rhizomes [12].cThe metrics of BiPo are: shoot density, shoot leaf surface area, lower depth limit and lower limit type [15].PREI, POMI and BiPo indices are based upon distinct but similar metrics and range from 0 (lowest ecological status) to 1 (highest ecological status).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study suggests that nutrient efflux can also show deterioration of P. oceanica vegetated sediments and, therefore, such flux can be used as indicator of P. oceanica communities' health. Phenological, biogeochemical, and demographic indicators have been used so far to evaluate P. oceanica status (Pergent-Martini et al, 2005;Holmer et al, 2008;Perez et al, 2008;Montefalcone, 2009;Lopez y Royo et al, 2010). However, most of the metrics operate at individual or population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of 'new diagnostic tools' to monitor the meadows conservation status is a critical issue. Standard monitoring indicators are several [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]; according to Montefalcone [11] standard monitoring indicators can be classified as structural descriptors at individual level (shoot phenology and biomass), at population level (bed density and coverage) or at community level (leaves epiphytes). However, many of them suffer of a lack in sensitivity and often to obtain significant information it's necessary to use a combination/integration of indicators [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%