2017
DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa7b1d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bioprintable form of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering

Abstract: Bioprinting can be defined as 3D patterning of living cells and other biologics by filling and assembling them using a computer-aided layer-by-layer deposition approach to fabricate living tissue and organ analogs for tissue engineering. The presence of cells within the ink to use a 'bio-ink' presents the potential to print 3D structures that can be implanted or printed into damaged/diseased bone tissue to promote highly controlled cell-based regeneration and remineralization of bone. In this study, it was sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
199
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 308 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous groups have demonstrated the ability of growth factors such as BMP‐2 to induce osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3‐M1 cells in vitro (Ogasawara et al, ). Alternatively, other groups have explored the encapsulation of MC3T3‐M1 cells into polymeric hydrogels with embedded bioactive cues such as nanostructured bone‐like HA (Demirtas, Irmak, & Gumusderelioglu, ), inorganic polyphosphate chains (Wu et al, ), and different types of BGs (Marelli et al, ; Zeng, Han, Li, & Chang, ). Here, we hypothesized that the incorporation of BG‐5/5 into GelMA hydrogels could yield a highly cytocompatible matrix with intrinsic osteogenic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous groups have demonstrated the ability of growth factors such as BMP‐2 to induce osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3‐M1 cells in vitro (Ogasawara et al, ). Alternatively, other groups have explored the encapsulation of MC3T3‐M1 cells into polymeric hydrogels with embedded bioactive cues such as nanostructured bone‐like HA (Demirtas, Irmak, & Gumusderelioglu, ), inorganic polyphosphate chains (Wu et al, ), and different types of BGs (Marelli et al, ; Zeng, Han, Li, & Chang, ). Here, we hypothesized that the incorporation of BG‐5/5 into GelMA hydrogels could yield a highly cytocompatible matrix with intrinsic osteogenic activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological evaluation also showed a spread of PC12 cells on the conductive hydrogel, which was confirmed by the strong neurite outgrowth of cells on the conductive hydrogel induced during the differentiation process after growth factor treatment. A polyurethane hybrid composite was devised using PSS doped PEDOT and liquid crystal GO, a polyether-based liner polyurethane and the conductive hydrogel obtained high biocompatibility, conductivity, and flexibility [172]. The synthesized polyurethane hybrid composite conductive hydrogel showed 10-times higher conductivity, 1.6-times higher tensile modulus, and 1.56-times the yield strength than a control group.…”
Section: Nerve Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various sizes of HAp particles from nano to micro scale were dispersed in hydrogels and printed as bone substitute scaffolds. Demirtas et al printed chitosan-HA hydrogels using a 3D plotting method and compared them with alginate-HAp hydrogels [104] . With the addition of about 180 nm HAp particles, elastic modulus of alginateHAp hydrogels and chitosan-HAp hydrogels increased approximately 3-and-5 fold compare to pure alginate and chitosan hydrogels.…”
Section: Hard Tissue Engineering Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%