2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2018.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biopredictive In Vitro Comparison of Oral Locally Acting Mesalazine Formulations by a Novel Dissolution Model for Assessing Intraluminal Drug Release in Individual Subjects

Abstract: Drug release and availability at the site of action are the major factors determining the clinical response for locally-acting gastrointestinal (GI) drug products. The present work focused on the prediction of site and extent of in vivo mesalazine release after oral administration to a variety of subjects using individualized in vitro drug release experiments. First, experiments mimicking GI passages in average adult subjects were performed. Then, results from a study screening fasted in vivo pH and transit pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The automated system produced a slower onset of dissolution in Hanks buffer compared to the USP phosphate buffer, applying the same pH gradient manually (by adding sodium hydroxide) [111]. Likewise, the in vitro dissolution of monolithic mesalazine locally acting colonic delivery products was delayed in CarbSIF (pH gradient handled by the automated system) compared to phosphate with the same gradient, revealing differences in the in vivo performance between Salofalk ® and Claversal ® coated tablets [88]. The ability to replicate pH gradients during dissolution can be very valuable to assess the robustness of drug products in different scenarios where intestinal pH and transit may change significantly.…”
Section: Automated Methods To Stabilize Bicarbonate Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The automated system produced a slower onset of dissolution in Hanks buffer compared to the USP phosphate buffer, applying the same pH gradient manually (by adding sodium hydroxide) [111]. Likewise, the in vitro dissolution of monolithic mesalazine locally acting colonic delivery products was delayed in CarbSIF (pH gradient handled by the automated system) compared to phosphate with the same gradient, revealing differences in the in vivo performance between Salofalk ® and Claversal ® coated tablets [88]. The ability to replicate pH gradients during dissolution can be very valuable to assess the robustness of drug products in different scenarios where intestinal pH and transit may change significantly.…”
Section: Automated Methods To Stabilize Bicarbonate Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more comprehensive analysis of transit variability effects was performed by Karkossa and Klein, who studied the in vitro dissolution of different mesalazine products in a multistage system using CarbSIF media [88]. They optimized transit time vs. pH gradient to account for different physiological scenarios previously observed (Figure 3, Karkossa et al) [4].…”
Section: In Vitro Methodologies For Time-controlled Release Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the tested constant release formulation (Pentasa ® ) 50% was lost in the initial phase in an acidic ‘stomach-like’ environment, in contrast to the pH-triggered release variants ( 27 ). This notable effect however, was not confirmed by Karkossa and Klein ( 28 ) in their comprehensive and carefully designed in vitro comparison of different 5-ASA dosage forms. The chosen bicarbonate-based intestinal medium more accurately reflected physiological conditions, and their simulations of gastrointestinal transition were based on reliable in vivo measurements of pH and transit times.…”
Section: In Vitro Models Of Drug Releasementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Fluid samples were withdrawn continually for spectrophotometrical assay (λ=244 nm) at fixed time points and subsequently reintroduced into the vessel. Release tests (n=3) were carried out under sink conditions, here meant as those at which the concentration of the drug was <20% of its solubility in phosphate buffer pH 6.8 at 37 °C (~3.5 g/l) (Karkossa and Klein, 2018).…”
Section: In Vitro Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%