2015
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1039604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biomechanical and subjective comparison of two powered ambulance cots

Abstract: This study compared two powered ambulance cots, one that lifts/lowers the front and rear wheels independently and one that lifts/lowers the four wheels simultaneously during ambulance loading and unloading. Measured muscle activity, ground reaction forces and operator perceptions support using cot designs that lift/lower the front and rear wheels independently.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…as well as individual factors (such as current wrist health condition) is expected to provide a higher sensitivity of measure. The proposed system is partly inspired by the well-established use of EMG ergonomics assessment method such as from Sommerich et al [43,44] and Lavender et al [45] , which evaluates the individual capacity through normalization of real time muscle activity data over the maximum voluntary exertion. Normalizing data to maximum capacity may provide a higher sensitivity to capture development of WMSDs risks due to individual factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as individual factors (such as current wrist health condition) is expected to provide a higher sensitivity of measure. The proposed system is partly inspired by the well-established use of EMG ergonomics assessment method such as from Sommerich et al [43,44] and Lavender et al [45] , which evaluates the individual capacity through normalization of real time muscle activity data over the maximum voluntary exertion. Normalizing data to maximum capacity may provide a higher sensitivity to capture development of WMSDs risks due to individual factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of electrically powered cots has been shown to decrease injury rates and WC claims . Electrically powered cots are most successful when the cots eliminate all weight‐bearing requirements on the part of the EMS worker . While powered cots can reduce the potential for worker overexertion when lifting and lowering, and during ambulance loading and unloading, they are also notably heavier than non‐powered cots .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies related to cot design generally supported powered over manual features (26,27), cot legs that folded individually rather than simultaneously (10,28,29), and handles that were designed for both grip and comfort (30). Although powered cots were expensive, heavy and could not be used in many environments, their implementation reduced stretcher-related injuries by over 70% (26,27).…”
Section: Cotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although powered cots were expensive, heavy and could not be used in many environments, their implementation reduced stretcher-related injuries by over 70% (26,27). However, for EMS services that did not have the funding for powered cots, manual cots with legs that retracted independently required less lifting forces and effort because the non-retracted leg could support a large proportion of the cot's weight while (un)loading (28,29). Lastly, the specific shape, material and texture of the cot's handles should be considered to reduce pressure points while ensuring sufficient grip (30).…”
Section: Cotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation