2000
DOI: 10.1101/gr.10.4.391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biologist's View of the Drosophila Genome Annotation Assessment Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Guided by gene density estimates from the comprehensive analysis of the Adh region (Ashburner et al 1999), Adams et al made a conservative estimate of 13,601 genes. However, in light of the gene density in the annotated genome sequence, Ashburner conceded that their analysis of the Adh region may have been too conservative, which in turn affects the estimate by Adams et al (Adams et al 2000;Ashburner et al 2000). Our study of transcription in the testis clearly indicates the existence of a significant class of undetected genes in the current genome release.…”
Section: How Many Genes?mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guided by gene density estimates from the comprehensive analysis of the Adh region (Ashburner et al 1999), Adams et al made a conservative estimate of 13,601 genes. However, in light of the gene density in the annotated genome sequence, Ashburner conceded that their analysis of the Adh region may have been too conservative, which in turn affects the estimate by Adams et al (Adams et al 2000;Ashburner et al 2000). Our study of transcription in the testis clearly indicates the existence of a significant class of undetected genes in the current genome release.…”
Section: How Many Genes?mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The alcohol dehydrogenase region of Drosophila is a case in point. Gene-calling programs failed to identify some known genes in this region (Ashburner et al 1999;Ashburner 2000;Birney and Durbin 2000;Gaasterland et al 2000;Henikoff and Henikoff 2000;Krogh 2000;Parra et al 2000;Reese et al 2000a;Salamov and Solovyev 2000). Expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis is also an important tool for identifying transcription units but is also subject to errors (Adams et al 1991;Okubo et al 1992;Weinstock et al 1994;Adams et al 1995;Hillier et al 1996;Audic and Claverie 1997;Wolfsberg and Landsman 1997;Rubin et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is crucial, since this data set is to serve as a basis for most of the postgenomic analysis. In Drosophila, a large-scale experiment has been devised to confront gene prediction programs and experimental approaches (1), based on high-resolution gene mapping in a well-known region of the genome. In Chlamydomo-nas, the early sequencing of a large stretch of genomic DNA has allowed benchmarking of greenGenie and a preliminary assessment of gene content (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…] The identification of all expressed genes and the structure(s) of their transcripts are prerequisites for many structural and functional genomic studies. Gene-finding programs are valuable tools for identifying gene structure, but they are errorprone and suffer from the inability to predict untranslated regions (UTRs) (Ashburner 2000;Reese et al 2000). Direct analysis of gene transcripts is the only proven way to establish gene structures with confidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%