2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.04.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biological effects monitoring survey of Cardigan Bay using flatfish histopathology, cellular biomarkers and sediment bioassays: Findings of the Prince Madog Prize 2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, their presence at elevated levels at particular inshore or estuarine sites has been correlated with the burden of specific xenobiotic chemicals in the sediment and in tissues of fish from those sites (Koehler 1990, Stein et al 1990, Myers et al 2008. Although intuitive that the higher prevalence of liver neoplasia in dab from certain CSEMP sites identified in the present study may be associated with elevated levels of carcinogenic contaminants in sediment and tissues at those sites, or even elevated biomarker responses, the demonstration of these relationships has proved more elusive, with less clear links between causal contaminants and disease at offshore locations (Cefas 2006, 2007, Lyons et al 2006. Work in our laboratory at present is attempting to interpret this apparent paradox by investigation of potential confounding factors that may alter the expression of biomarkers and the prevalence of disease.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Stability In Marine Disease Profilesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As such, their presence at elevated levels at particular inshore or estuarine sites has been correlated with the burden of specific xenobiotic chemicals in the sediment and in tissues of fish from those sites (Koehler 1990, Stein et al 1990, Myers et al 2008. Although intuitive that the higher prevalence of liver neoplasia in dab from certain CSEMP sites identified in the present study may be associated with elevated levels of carcinogenic contaminants in sediment and tissues at those sites, or even elevated biomarker responses, the demonstration of these relationships has proved more elusive, with less clear links between causal contaminants and disease at offshore locations (Cefas 2006, 2007, Lyons et al 2006. Work in our laboratory at present is attempting to interpret this apparent paradox by investigation of potential confounding factors that may alter the expression of biomarkers and the prevalence of disease.…”
Section: Temporal and Spatial Stability In Marine Disease Profilesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…While the capacity to link elevated levels of carcinogenic contaminants is potentially feasible for those animals sampled from relatively constrained water bodies (e.g. estuaries, rivers, lakes) (Köhler 1990, Stein et al 1990, 1998a, it is more problematic when attempting to investigate similar relationships in the offshore environment, where contaminant burdens are invariably lower and population migrations are more pronounced (Cefas 2006, 2007, Lyons et al 2006, Vethaak et al 2009). Nevertheless, repeatable patterns of disease (including cancer) are reported from geographically distinct sites sampled over multiple years using standardised approaches for disease assessment, suggesting that a basis for this pattern exists (Stentiford et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UK sites exceeding 20%. [31][32][33][34][35] However, the causative factors of these tumors and the molecular mechanisms involved, especially the balance between epigenetic and genetic factors, is unclear. Previous studies in our laboratory indicated that mutation profiles of oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes within tumors were different between fish species and humans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%