2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98702-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bioinformatics Protocol for Quickly Creating Large-Scale Phylogenetic Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of a fast an efficient protocol for the identification of GULO gene in annotated genomes led to the identification of this gene in 118 species, in groups such as the Anthozoa (non-Bilaterian), Araneae, Priapulida, Brachiopoda and Gastropoda (Protostomians) [17]. This result motivated us to use non-annotated genomes of further non-Bilateria and Protostomia species that belong to phylogenetic groups that were not well represented in [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The implementation of a fast an efficient protocol for the identification of GULO gene in annotated genomes led to the identification of this gene in 118 species, in groups such as the Anthozoa (non-Bilaterian), Araneae, Priapulida, Brachiopoda and Gastropoda (Protostomians) [17]. This result motivated us to use non-annotated genomes of further non-Bilateria and Protostomia species that belong to phylogenetic groups that were not well represented in [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of a fast an efficient protocol for the identification of GULO gene in annotated genomes led to the identification of this gene in 118 species, in groups such as the Anthozoa (non-Bilaterian), Araneae, Priapulida, Brachiopoda and Gastropoda (Protostomians) [17]. This result motivated us to use non-annotated genomes of further non-Bilateria and Protostomia species that belong to phylogenetic groups that were not well represented in [17]. Furthermore, since many taxonomic groups are represented by a reduced number of annotated species genomes only, we decided to perform our own annotations using these genomes to avoid loss of information that could arise from poor annotations that were eventually removed in [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations