2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:wafo.0000028363.48348.a4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Biogeochemical Comparison of Two Well-Buffered Catchments with Contrasting Histories of Acid Deposition

Abstract: Abstract. Much of the biogeochemical cycling research in catchments in the past 25 years has been driven by acid deposition research funding. This research has focused on vulnerable base-poor systems; catchments on alkaline lithologies have received little attention. In regions of high acid loadings, however, even well-buffered catchments are susceptible to forest decline and episodes of low alkalinity in streamwater. As part of a collaboration between the Czech and U.S. Geological Surveys, we compared biogeoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four dissolved chemical solutes were included in this analysis: sulfate (SO 2− 4 ), silica (Si), nitrate (NO − 3 ), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). These solutes were selected because they differ in their sources, predominant hydrologic flowpaths, and biogeochemical reactivities at these watersheds (Johnson et al 1969, Lawrence and Driscoll 1990, Stoddard and Murdoch 1991, Shanley and Peters 1993, Huntington et al 1994, Burns et al 1998, Shanley et al 2004, Peters et al 2006, Sebestyen et al 2009, 2014 resulting in a wide range of solute dynamics that are expected to be representative of many solutes at other sites. The most important differentiating characteristics of these solutes are that SO 2− 4 is atmospherically derived and can be somewhat reactive, Si is a weathering product that behaves conservatively, and NO − 3 and DOC are biogeochemically controlled and have contrasting strengths of concentration-discharge relations.…”
Section: Chemical Solutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four dissolved chemical solutes were included in this analysis: sulfate (SO 2− 4 ), silica (Si), nitrate (NO − 3 ), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). These solutes were selected because they differ in their sources, predominant hydrologic flowpaths, and biogeochemical reactivities at these watersheds (Johnson et al 1969, Lawrence and Driscoll 1990, Stoddard and Murdoch 1991, Shanley and Peters 1993, Huntington et al 1994, Burns et al 1998, Shanley et al 2004, Peters et al 2006, Sebestyen et al 2009, 2014 resulting in a wide range of solute dynamics that are expected to be representative of many solutes at other sites. The most important differentiating characteristics of these solutes are that SO 2− 4 is atmospherically derived and can be somewhat reactive, Si is a weathering product that behaves conservatively, and NO − 3 and DOC are biogeochemically controlled and have contrasting strengths of concentration-discharge relations.…”
Section: Chemical Solutesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples at Panola were not analyzed for DOC for a sufficiently long period to include in this analysis. Storms were sampled at Río Mameyes sporadically through- Bailey 1976, McNab and Avers 1994, Griffith et al 2001, and Bryce et al 2010. ¶ Shanley et al (2004.…”
Section: Watershed Descriptions and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watershed 9 has an area of 41 ha and ranges in elevation from 519 to 686 m. Streamflow is measured with a broad-crested V-notch weir. Watershed 9 is a forested, calcareous catchment with areas of poor drainage supporting small wetlands, peat, and mucky riparian soils [Shanley et al, 2004]. The catchment is underlain by the Waits River Formation, a sulfidic calcareous granulite interbedded with micaceous phyllites and biotite schists that generates neutral pH, calcium-bicarbonate-sulfate waters [Hall, 1959;Bailey et al, 2004;Mitchell et al, 2008].…”
Section: Sleepers Rivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no permafrost, but soil frost depth can reach to 60 cm during winter (Mellander et al, 2007). The forested W-9 catchment at Sleepers River, Vermont, USA, has a humid continental climate (Shanley et al, 2004), with T, P and Q of 4.7 C, 1256 mm and 743 mm, respectively. Soil frost is intermittent and is usually <10 cm in the forest (Shanley and Chalmers, 1999).…”
Section: Study Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%