2009
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biofilm growth protocol and the design of a magnetic field exposure setup to be used in the study of magnetic fields as a means of controlling bacterial biofilms

Abstract: The use of prosthetic implants is increasing both in the United States and around the world and there is a concomitant rise in cases of biofilm-based, persistent infections that are quite serious and virtually impervious to antibiotic treatment. The development of alternate therapies that do not involve long term use of high levels of antibiotics or surgical intervention is needed. Based on the success of using electric or magnetic fields to alter certain physiological processes, it is hypothesized that relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are difficult to treat using antibiotics (30). Changes in the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm have been observed in response to changes in weak magnetic fields (31,32). In another well‐controlled trial, low‐intensity millimeter waves were effective at accelerating wound clearance when infected with a microflora containing mixed agent species (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are difficult to treat using antibiotics (30). Changes in the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm have been observed in response to changes in weak magnetic fields (31,32). In another well‐controlled trial, low‐intensity millimeter waves were effective at accelerating wound clearance when infected with a microflora containing mixed agent species (33,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates were grown on TSA plates incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and then suspended in normal saline to reach a concentration equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland. The in vitro model consisted of a previously described CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) model (BioSurfaces Technologies, Bozeman, MT, USA), which we modified to run PK/PD, simulating human PK to evaluate the in vitro activity of antimicrobials [ 11 , 17 , 18 ]. Briefly, a 40-h biofilm conditioning phase was performed prior to drug therapy initiation and consisted of a 24 h incubation at 37 °C in 1% gSTSB inoculated with the specified organism, followed by 16 h of a continuous flow with 1/10th gSTSB performed with peristaltic pumps (Masterflex ® ; Cole-Parmer Instrument Company, Chicago, IL, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based our protocol for biofilm growth upon the methods previously published by Donlan et al and McLeod and Sandvik (14,23). Briefly, a CDC biofilm reactor (CBR) model (BioSurfaces Technologies, Bozeman, MT) was set up with 24 polycarbonate coupons inserted into eight rods (3 coupons per rod).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%