2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13346-015-0240-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biodegradable ocular implant for long-term suppression of intraocular pressure

Abstract: Timolol maleate (TM) has been used for many years for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients. However, the topical mode of administration (eyedrops) is far from optimal because of the issues of low bioavailability, high drug wastage, and lack of patient compliance. Suboptimal control of the IOP leads to disease progression and eventually to blindness. Ideally, TM is delivered to the patient so that its action is both localized and sustained for 3 months or more. In this work, we devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…38,39 Subconjunctival injection of controlled release formulations of brimonidine and timolol lowered IOP for 28 days and >4 months, respectively. 40,41 The addition of a formulation for controlled release of a CAI after subconjunctival injection adds another glaucoma treatment option. It is likely that multiple, controlled release treatment options will be needed to adequately meet clinical needs of glaucoma treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38,39 Subconjunctival injection of controlled release formulations of brimonidine and timolol lowered IOP for 28 days and >4 months, respectively. 40,41 The addition of a formulation for controlled release of a CAI after subconjunctival injection adds another glaucoma treatment option. It is likely that multiple, controlled release treatment options will be needed to adequately meet clinical needs of glaucoma treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the method allowed for the detection of biomarkers at the desired depth only, selectively sampling either ISF or blood, a clear signalconcentration relationship was not established, limiting this technique to qualitative analysis until further development. [64] The Kendall group has also focused on simultaneous biomarker detection, designing multiplexed MN arrays capable of detecting analyte biomarkers alongside positive and negative controls. By dividing the array into three parts and functionalizing each section with a different antibody, it was possible to semiquantitatively detect the protein rPfHRP2 (a structural protein serving as a marker of Plasmodium falciparum Small 2018, 14,1803186 infection) relative to total IgG concentration, which acted as a positive control.…”
Section: Mns For the Selective Capture Of Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] Ocular implants allow the drug to reside at the site of action without having to deliver a large dose over a long period of time. [37] Despite these many benefits, the intravitreal administration of ocular implants does have major drawbacks, some of which include inconveniencing patients in terms of administration, risk of tissue damage and severe but rare adverse reactions such as endophthalmitis and haemorrhage. [38] In addition, high concentrations of intraocular drug delivery may lead to an increase in intraocular pressure in the eye and it may also induce local systemic adverse effects.…”
Section: Liposomesmentioning
confidence: 99%