2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bioassay-based protocol for chemical neutralization of human faecal wastes treated by physico-chemical disinfection processes: A case study on benzalkonium chloride

Abstract: A B S T R A C TIn situ physico-chemical disinfection of high risk faecal waste is both effective and widely used as a sanitation management strategy for infection prevention and control. Systematic tests where the performance of alternative physico-chemical disinfection methods is systematically compared and optimized must be based on reliable protocols. These protocol are currently not adequately addressing the neutralization related issues: the neutralization of the tested disinfectant after specified condit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each study involved its own control group as viability (microorganism) treatment for toxicity study and the toxicity (microorganism plus neutralizer) group for neutralizer efficacy. It should be noted that the microbial toxicity might originate from the neutralizer ingredients, disinfectant components (from its trace amounts, if complete neutralization was not ensured) and/or the byproduct of the chemical neutralization process due to neutralizer-biocide interaction (28,(30)(31)(32). The selected microbial count range for the serial dilution of > 40 to 100 CFU/plate was selected as an optimal bioburden range to minimize count error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study involved its own control group as viability (microorganism) treatment for toxicity study and the toxicity (microorganism plus neutralizer) group for neutralizer efficacy. It should be noted that the microbial toxicity might originate from the neutralizer ingredients, disinfectant components (from its trace amounts, if complete neutralization was not ensured) and/or the byproduct of the chemical neutralization process due to neutralizer-biocide interaction (28,(30)(31)(32). The selected microbial count range for the serial dilution of > 40 to 100 CFU/plate was selected as an optimal bioburden range to minimize count error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined use of QAC and PHMG as biocides to prevent the biodegradation of human waste products by saprotrophic microorganisms and eliminate an unpleasant odor in fecal sludge (FS), for example, in environmentally safe toilet complexes (ESTC) of passenger railcars, has the task of preserving human waste products until their subsequent processing or disposal [ 42 , 43 ]. However, when disposed of in municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), such waste poses a potential threat, as it negatively affects activated sludge, inhibiting the processes of nitrification, denitrification, and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) [ 44 , 45 ]. Therefore, before their disposal, preliminary neutralization of the toxic effect of biocides should be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biocides have found wide application as components of deodorants that prevent the biodegradation of fecal sludge (FS) and eliminate undesirable odor in dry closets, vacuum toilets in airplanes [9,10], and environmentally safe toilet complexes (ESTC) in passenger rail transport [11]. Most of these agents contain quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) and guanidine derivatives (e.g., polyhexamethylene guanidine, PHMG), which inhibit the activity or cause the death of microorganisms and helminths [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%