2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-02305-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bioactive Chemical Markers Based Strategy for Quality Assessment of Botanical Drugs: Xuesaitong Injection as a Case Study

Abstract: Current chemical markers based quality assessment methods largely fail to reflect intrinsic chemical complexity and multiple mechanisms of action of botanical drugs (BD). The development of novel quality markers is greatly needed. Here we propose bioactive chemical markers (BCM), defined as a group of chemo-markers that exhibit similar pharmacological activities comparable to the whole BD, which can therefore be used to effectively assess the quality of BD. As a proof-of-concept, a BCM-based strategy was devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports of inaccurate labelling and batch-to-batch variation of active ingredients within magistral CME preparations confirm fears that these products lack standardisation [29, 91, 92]. Being able to characterise accurately the complexity of botanical drug forms and to discriminate the efficacy of their constituents both singularly and in combination remains challenging [93]. This is highlighted by the fact that, so far, only two botanical drug forms have met the Botanical Guidance definition of a botanical drug product and received New Drug Application approval and prescription drug marketing authorisation by the FDA (Veregen® from Camellia sinensis as well as Fulyzaq TM [Mytesi TM ] from Croton lechleri ) [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports of inaccurate labelling and batch-to-batch variation of active ingredients within magistral CME preparations confirm fears that these products lack standardisation [29, 91, 92]. Being able to characterise accurately the complexity of botanical drug forms and to discriminate the efficacy of their constituents both singularly and in combination remains challenging [93]. This is highlighted by the fact that, so far, only two botanical drug forms have met the Botanical Guidance definition of a botanical drug product and received New Drug Application approval and prescription drug marketing authorisation by the FDA (Veregen® from Camellia sinensis as well as Fulyzaq TM [Mytesi TM ] from Croton lechleri ) [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMC or EEC was determined using an (animal) bioactivities model. Lee et al [73] determined 14 markers simultaneously (Herb MaRS ranked >3) from Chinese medicine formulations containing a seven herbs mixture; the same concept using many markers as a QC tool was developed by Yang et al (74); these markers were named bioactive chemical markers (BMC). According to the description of EMC, EEC and BMC, these categories of marker could also be defined as QA-marker(s).…”
Section: Chemical Profiling Methods As Qc Tool For Herbal Medicinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NG-R1 has been identified as one of the bioactive chemical markers of Xuesaitong Injection (XST), 94 which is made of the saponins from P. notoginseng and has been extensively employed in clinic for managing cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in China. 95 Naodesheng (NDS) is the TCM prescription widely used for clinic management of cerebral infarction in China. NG-R1 is one of the bioactive compounds in NDS, which has been demonstrated to improve neurobehavioral activity, decrease the cerebral infarct area, and attenuate pathological features in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rat models.…”
Section: Clinical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%