2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-017-6723-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bio-antifelting agent based on waterborne polyurethane and keratin polypeptides extracted by protease from waste wool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, test results clearly showed that treated wool fabric with Pulcra HPU emulsion could not meet the Woolmark TM 31 technical standard in less than 3.0% of machine‐washable wool products for any washing cycle. If the results are discussed after 3x5A washing, a commonly used procedure in literature and industry, while Pulcra HPU did not create a significant effect when compared to raw fabric, all SMPU treatments decreased felting shrinkage of the fabric significantly. Performance of Pulcra HPU may be related to thinner film formation on fiber surface which is insufficient to prevent relative mobility of the fibers and cuticle layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, test results clearly showed that treated wool fabric with Pulcra HPU emulsion could not meet the Woolmark TM 31 technical standard in less than 3.0% of machine‐washable wool products for any washing cycle. If the results are discussed after 3x5A washing, a commonly used procedure in literature and industry, while Pulcra HPU did not create a significant effect when compared to raw fabric, all SMPU treatments decreased felting shrinkage of the fabric significantly. Performance of Pulcra HPU may be related to thinner film formation on fiber surface which is insufficient to prevent relative mobility of the fibers and cuticle layer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tear strength values in both warp and weft directions were affected negatively from Pulcra HPU application (Table ). On the other hand, significant tear strength increases were achieved with neat SMPU and SMPU‐CNW nanocomposite finishing as a result of thicker film formation on yarns and accumulated polymer among yarns increasing flexural stiffness and stress modulus of fabric especially in weft direction compared to raw and WO‐Pulcra HPU. The tear strength of the fabrics in both warp and weft directions increased with the increase of CNW concentration in the composite structure but the differences were not significant except for the performance of WO‐SMPU‐CNW20 for warp direction which includes the highest CNW concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, SMPU treatment, especially at 20 wt% concentration, created a thicker film layer on the surface of wool fibers and also covered the scales (as seen in SEM images), reducing the fiber-fiber friction effect in the cuticle layer and preventing felting shrinkage. 9…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L 0 and L 1 are sample lengths before and after washing, WS is the average value of dimensional change in weft direction (%), and LS is the average value of dimensional change in the warp direction (%). 9,10…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation