2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2020.120067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A binuclear chloride bridged Cu(II) and a mononuclear Ni(II) complex: Synthesis, crystal structure, photo catalytic and biological studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated bond angle (°) values of 8N−Ni−3N, 31N−Ni−8N, 36N−Ni−15N, 3N−Ni−31N, 43N−Ni−36N and 15N−Ni−43N are found to be in the range 97.12–125.57, 110.92–115.67, 109.79–130.54, 121.76–135.25, 125.56–138.21 and 101.76–111.59 for the nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 8N−Cu−3N, 31N−Cu−8N, 36N−Cu−15N, 3N−Cu−31N, 43N−Cu−36N and 15N−Cu−43N are found to be in the range 99.24–132.66, 110.42–122.14, 118.33–169.71, 15.01–165.81, 121.38–147.69 and 118.08–124.71 for the copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 8N−Zn−3N, 31N−Zn−8N, 36N−Zn−15N, 3N−Zn−31N, 43N−Zn−36N and 15N−Zn−43N are found to be in the range 107.53–130.42, 109.88–124.21, 120.65–128.02, 108.83–149.11, 129.03–154.20 and 92.98–120.75 for the zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), respectively. The deviation in the bond length values are found to be 0.012–0.014, 0.010–0.011, 0.015–0.019, 0.013–0.024, 0.011–0.016 and 0.167–0.179 (Å) for nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 0.010–0.012, 0.011–0.015, 0.010–0.017, 0.014–0.023, 0.012–0.016 and 0.159–0.161 (Å) for copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 0.012–0.013, 0.010–0.014, 0.017–0.020, 0.012–0.020, 0.010–0.014 and 0.165–0.175 (Å) for zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), whereas that of the bond angles are found to be 1.0–1.5, 0.9–1.3, 1.1–1.5, 0.9–1.4, 1.3–1.5 and 1.4–2.4° for nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 0.9–1.3, 0.8–1.2, 1.0–1.4, 1,1–1.2, 1.2–1.6 and 1.5–2.7° for copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 1.0–1.6, 1.0–1.5, 1.1–1.5, 0.9–1.2, 1.2–1.4 and 1.3–2.3° for zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), respectively, which are reliable with the reported crystallographic data [38] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated bond angle (°) values of 8N−Ni−3N, 31N−Ni−8N, 36N−Ni−15N, 3N−Ni−31N, 43N−Ni−36N and 15N−Ni−43N are found to be in the range 97.12–125.57, 110.92–115.67, 109.79–130.54, 121.76–135.25, 125.56–138.21 and 101.76–111.59 for the nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 8N−Cu−3N, 31N−Cu−8N, 36N−Cu−15N, 3N−Cu−31N, 43N−Cu−36N and 15N−Cu−43N are found to be in the range 99.24–132.66, 110.42–122.14, 118.33–169.71, 15.01–165.81, 121.38–147.69 and 118.08–124.71 for the copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 8N−Zn−3N, 31N−Zn−8N, 36N−Zn−15N, 3N−Zn−31N, 43N−Zn−36N and 15N−Zn−43N are found to be in the range 107.53–130.42, 109.88–124.21, 120.65–128.02, 108.83–149.11, 129.03–154.20 and 92.98–120.75 for the zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), respectively. The deviation in the bond length values are found to be 0.012–0.014, 0.010–0.011, 0.015–0.019, 0.013–0.024, 0.011–0.016 and 0.167–0.179 (Å) for nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 0.010–0.012, 0.011–0.015, 0.010–0.017, 0.014–0.023, 0.012–0.016 and 0.159–0.161 (Å) for copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 0.012–0.013, 0.010–0.014, 0.017–0.020, 0.012–0.020, 0.010–0.014 and 0.165–0.175 (Å) for zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), whereas that of the bond angles are found to be 1.0–1.5, 0.9–1.3, 1.1–1.5, 0.9–1.4, 1.3–1.5 and 1.4–2.4° for nickel(II) complexes ( 1 – 4 ), 0.9–1.3, 0.8–1.2, 1.0–1.4, 1,1–1.2, 1.2–1.6 and 1.5–2.7° for copper(II) complexes ( 5 – 8 ), and 1.0–1.6, 1.0–1.5, 1.1–1.5, 0.9–1.2, 1.2–1.4 and 1.3–2.3° for zinc(II) complexes ( 9 – 12 ), respectively, which are reliable with the reported crystallographic data [38] …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…All the synthesized ligands (L [1][2][3][4] ) and their metal(II) complexes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) were optimized in the gas phase using the B3LYP/6-31G and LANL2DZ basis set levels and the optimized ground state geometry structures are given in Figures 4, and found to be 0.012-0.014, 0.010-0.011, 0.015-0.019, 0.013-0.024, 0.011-0.016 and 0.167-0.179 (Å) for nickel(II) complexes (1-4), 0.010-0.012, 0.011-0.015, 0.010-0.017, 0.014-0.023, 0.012-0.016 and 0.159-0.161 (Å) for copper(II) complexes (5-8), and 0.012-0.013, 0.010-0.014, 0.017-0.020, 0.012-0.020, 0.010-0.014 and 0.165-0.175 (Å) for zinc(II) complexes (9-12), whereas that of the bond angles are found to be 1.0-1.5, 0.9-1.3, 1.1-1.5, 0.9-1.4, 1.3-1.5 and 1.4-2.4°for nickel(II) complexes (1-4), 0.9-1.3, 0.8-1.2, 1.0-1.4, 1,1-1.2, 1.2-1.6 and 1.5-2.7°for copper(II) complexes (5-8), and 1.0-1.6, 1.0-1.5, 1.1-1.5, 0.9-1.2, 1.2-1.4 and 1.3-2.3°for zinc(II) complexes (9-12), respectively, which are reliable with the reported crystallographic data. [38]…”
Section: Geometry Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Therefore, the decrease in absorption suggested an appreciable interaction between the complex and DNA. 24 The binding efficiency of the complex has also been primarily checked by involving fluorescence emission studies. The title complex shows emission at 510 nm in the absence of DNA.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes in the absorption may include either an increase or decrease as these changes are very much of concern to the double-helical structure of DNA . Therefore, the decrease in absorption suggested an appreciable interaction between the complex and DNA …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is assumed that the death cases due to pancreatic cancer will beat those of breast cancer by 2025 as found in the study of 28 European countries . In the recent past, structurally novel transition metal complexes have found extensive applications for various biological activities due to their importance in improving the human health. The relevance of nickel for biological applications has improved after its identification as the active center in urease and other enzymes. , There are several nickel­(II) complexes that have been extensively explored for their importance in various biological activities such as antimicrobial, antiproliferative, antioxidant, and antibacterial. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%