1977
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/20.2.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A binary n-gram technique for automatic correction of substitution, deletion, insertion and reversal errors in words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in Section I, a context bound transformation can be regarded as a self-index representation of a kgram index [6], [7], [8], [9]. A k-gram index is a popular alternative for constructing inverted indexes on languages that are not amenable to term tokenization and stemming, and a core component in the highly successful BLAST application for searching in genomic data [12].…”
Section: Application: a K-gram Self-indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As explained in Section I, a context bound transformation can be regarded as a self-index representation of a kgram index [6], [7], [8], [9]. A k-gram index is a popular alternative for constructing inverted indexes on languages that are not amenable to term tokenization and stemming, and a core component in the highly successful BLAST application for searching in genomic data [12].…”
Section: Application: a K-gram Self-indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the discovery of the searching capabilities of the BWT, a folklore method for reducing space called a k-gram index was commonly used for substring searches [6], [7], [8], [9]. A k-gram index records the occurrences of each distinct substring of length k in an attempt to mimic the efficiency of inverted indexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a classical AI technique used mostly for error corrections (Riseman&Hanson, 1974;Ullmann, 1977). Finally, a very human-like fuzzy evaluation of strings not contained in the dictionary appeared, classifying them in several classes of peculiarity.…”
Section: Hascheck -A Learning (Semi)automatonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies focus on automatic spelling correction (Accomazzi, Eichhorn, Kurtz, Grant, & Murray, 2000;Angell, Freund, & Willett, 1983;Blair, 1960;Cucerzan & Brill, 2004;Damerau & Mays, 1989;Davidson, 1962;Gadd, 1988;Kukich, 1992;Landau & Vishkin, 1986;Petersen, 1986;Pollock & Zamora, 1984;Rogers & Willett, 1991;Takahashi, Itoh, Amano, & Yamashita, 1990;Ullmann, 1977;Zobel & Dart, 1995). A number of studies have highlighted the context for correcting such errors and eliminating ambiguity (Damerau, 1964;Hull, 1992;Mays, Damerau, & Mercer, 1991;Riseman & Ehrich, 1971;Schulz & Mihov, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%