2019
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201900246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bilinear identification‐modeling framework from time domain data

Abstract: An ever-increasing need for improving the accuracy includes more involved and detailed features, thus inevitably leading to larger-scale dynamical systems [1]. To overcome this problem, efficient finite methods heavily rely on model reduction. One of the main approaches to model reduction of both linear and nonlinear systems is by means of interpolation. The Loewner framework is a direct data-driven method able to identify and reduce models derived directly from measurements. For measured data in the frequency… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters can be recovered from LF by considering the 2nd kernel as a univariate rational function, but the pole residue form needs a special treatment and is usually quite challenging. Similar studies have been proposed in [12,17] for inferring bilinear or quadratic systems respectively, where an improvement towards bilinear identification was shown in [16] and in the current study.…”
Section: Polynomial Liftingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The parameters can be recovered from LF by considering the 2nd kernel as a univariate rational function, but the pole residue form needs a special treatment and is usually quite challenging. Similar studies have been proposed in [12,17] for inferring bilinear or quadratic systems respectively, where an improvement towards bilinear identification was shown in [16] and in the current study.…”
Section: Polynomial Liftingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In that case, its impulse response can be approximated by a Volterra series which is precisely the response of affine models. Here again for stability issues, instead of solving (27), one may similarly consider solving the problem (28), putting the nonlinearity on the output equation only, i.e. setting N = 0 r×r and  = A r , min…”
Section: Structured Nonlinear Model Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this model inference is reported in Figures 6 and 7, illustrating the responses with respect to the raw data, the (maximal/mean) errors and eigenvalues dispersion. Note that to preserve stability one solves the structured problems ( 25) and (28) instead of ( 24) and (27).…”
Section: Rough Grid: Process Illustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation