2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2002806117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bilateral tumor model identifies transcriptional programs associated with patient response to immune checkpoint blockade

Abstract: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is efficacious in many diverse cancer types, but not all patients respond. It is important to understand the mechanisms driving resistance to these treatments and to identify predictive biomarkers of response to provide best treatment options for all patients. Here we introduce a resection and response-assessment approach for studying the tumor microenvironment before or shortly after treatment initiation to identify predictive biomarkers differentiating responders from nonresp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(96 reference statements)
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously used these bilateral models to identify transcriptomic ICB response signatures in the early tumor microenvironment and extensively validated our ndings in separate patient cohorts of bladder cancer and melanoma patients treated with ICB 6,16 . In addition, our results using these models have been independently validated by other research groups in preclinical models and patient cohorts with various tumor types, underscoring their translational relevance [17][18][19][20] . Here, we aimed to discover time-critical events in the tumor microenvironment that underlie ICB e cacy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We have previously used these bilateral models to identify transcriptomic ICB response signatures in the early tumor microenvironment and extensively validated our ndings in separate patient cohorts of bladder cancer and melanoma patients treated with ICB 6,16 . In addition, our results using these models have been independently validated by other research groups in preclinical models and patient cohorts with various tumor types, underscoring their translational relevance [17][18][19][20] . Here, we aimed to discover time-critical events in the tumor microenvironment that underlie ICB e cacy.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…1 A and B). BALB/c mice were inoculated with a primary tumor (irradiated tumor) and a secondary tumor (nonirradiated tumor) to mimic the primary tumor and metastatic lesions in a clinical scenario (19,20). Because RT alone rarely induces an abscopal effect in preclinical or clinical studies (2, 21), we artificially defined "responsive" and "nonresponsive" by a relatively low criterion to better explore biomarkers in the early treatment stage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergent data suggest that the CCR5 and CXCR3 chemokine receptor pathways are needed for anti-PD-(L)1-mediated CD8 + T ex tumor recruitment and/or intratumoral positioning (101)(102)(103)(104). Heightened dual expression of the ligands for CCR5 and CXCR3 (CCL5 and CXCL9, respectively) positively correlates with the amount of tumor CD8a transcripts and patient survival in cancers of the ovary, breast, lung, colon, as well as melanoma (103).…”
Section: Tissue Distribution and Intratumoral Positioning Of Exhausted Cd8 + T Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%