A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Ferritinophagy from 2014 to 2021

Abstract

Objective: This study was to explore the research status and research hotspots of ferritinophagy in the past eight years. Methods: Relevant papers on ferritinophagy from 2014 to 2021 was retrieved from the science citation extended database of the Web of Science. Through the application of bibliometrics research methods and bibliometrics analysis software VOSviewer to extract, analyze and visualize journals, authors, research institutions and keywords, to clarify the hot spots and development history of peritoneal dialysis research. Results: A total of 134 studies were screened and included in this study. Overall, the output of ferritinophagy research had fluctuated in the past 8 years. China's research on ferritinophagy had the largest number of published articles. The United States still maintained a leading position in research in this field, and its citation frequency, H-index and funding output are all at the forefront. Among them, international cooperation with relevant institutions was also more frequent. Ferritinophagy was currently mainly focused on cell biology. Tumor research might be the next major clinical research direction in this field. The related research on oxidative stress pathways, cell death methods, and nuclear receptor co-activator 4 (NCOA4) in the field of ferritinophagy were current research hotspots. Conclusions: It could be understanding the research status and hotspots of ferritinophagy in the world more clearly and intuitively by using the bibliometric method.

Authors who contributed most to the fields of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis since 2011 using the hT-index: Bibliometric analysis

“…In each cycle, they enter hydration metrics, including body weight, blood pressure, urine output, and ultrafiltration volume. The use of bibliometrics and visual analysis has been applied in a number of disciplines, [26] including anesthesiology, ophthalmology, stomatology, and obstetrics and gynecology, [27][28][29][30] yet no bibliometric articles have been published on the authors who have contributed the most to HD/PD. Although authors from the United States were present in 30.6% of 7618 PD papers in 887 journals (6991 articles and 627 reviews) [31] and the United States was the most productive country (n = 51) of the 100 most influential papers on peritoneal dialysis, [32] IRAs (taking both publications and citations into account) dominated by the United States should be verified further.…”