A bibliometric analysis of global forest ecology research during 2002–2011

Abstract

Bibliometric is increasingly used for the analysis of discipline dynamics and management related decision-making. This study analyzes 937,923 keywords from 78,986 articles concerning forest ecology and conducts a serial analysis of these articles’ characteristics. The articles’ records, published between 2002 and 2011, were downloaded from the Web of Science, and their keywords were exported by Java processing programs. The result shows that forest ecology studies focused on forest diversity, conservation, dynamics and vegetation in the last decade. Developed countries, such as the USA, Canada, and Germany, were the most productive countries in the field of forest ecology research. From 2002 to 2011, the number of articles published annually related to forest ecology grew at a stable rate, as indicated by the fit produced by a high determination coefficient (R2 = 0.9955). The findings of this study may be applicable for planning and managing forest ecology research and partners involved in such research may use this study as a reference.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-204) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Community forestry research in Canada: A bibliometric perspective

“…Bibliometric approaches to research evaluation have since become established and offer a useful tool to survey trends in entire disciplines as well as thematic areas of research. For example, bibliometric studies have been used to ambitiously investigate the thematic focus of entire fields, such as ecological economics (Castro e Silva and Teixeira, 2011), ecology (Neff and Corley, 2009) and, more specifically, forest ecology (Song and Zhao, 2013). Others have undertaken bibliometric analyses of thematic research areas such as green-roof development (Blank et al, 2013) and biodiversity (Liu et al, 2011).…”

Framing Indigenous Bioenergy Partnerships

“…Standard bibliometrics, including the year of publication, article keywords, region of study, and authorship, were analysed to provide a portrait of the literature used for the frame analyses (Bullock & Lawler, 2015;Song & Zhao, 2013). Of the 23 articles that were included, 14 were from the past 3 years (6 from 2015, 5 from 2016, and 3 from 2017).…”

Measuring popularity of ecological topics in a temporal dynamical knowledge network

“…In bibliometric studies, keyword analysis, as core content summary of articles, has long been used to identify research focus in ecological disciplines (Budilova et al 1997; Liu et al 2011; Song & Zhao 2013; Stork & Astrin 2014; Wang et al 2015; Romanelli et al 2018). Author keywords contain information that authors consider as most concerned and relevant to their studies, and high-frequency keywords are deemed to reflect the hot issues, and could be used to reveal the research trends (Li et al 2011; Li et al 2017; Yang et al 2017; Yin et al 2018).…”