The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1995
DOI: 10.2307/2331350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bias in Closing Prices: The Case of the When-Issued Pricing Anomaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted before, the research on such when-issued trading has been an exclusively U.S. preoccupation. This paper shows that the when-issued premium is a more global phenomenon, even though the premium we calculate is lower than the one found in previous studies, such as Brooks and Chiou (1995) and Nayar and Rozeff (2001). Second, our analysis offers additional insights in the workings of whenissued markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As noted before, the research on such when-issued trading has been an exclusively U.S. preoccupation. This paper shows that the when-issued premium is a more global phenomenon, even though the premium we calculate is lower than the one found in previous studies, such as Brooks and Chiou (1995) and Nayar and Rozeff (2001). Second, our analysis offers additional insights in the workings of whenissued markets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 41%
“…For example, Lamoureux and Wansley (1989) present a mean when-issued premium of 0.70% during the thirty-three trading days before the ex-date. Brooks and Chiou (1995) report an average proportional difference of 1.24% over the twenty trading days before the split. Nayar and Rozeff (2001) calculate an average premium of 1.93% over an interval of ten days around the record date of the stock split.…”
Section: Related Literature On Stock Splits and When-issued Tradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifi cally, the split-adjusted prices of whenissued shares are about 1% above the price of the unsplit shares. Brooks and Chiou (1995) controlled for a variety of factors such as time of the transaction, and reported a premium of 0.75%. As further support of the inconvenience hypothesis, Angel, Brooks, and Mathew (2004) found that volume in the when-issued shares increases by three-fold following the record date of the stock split.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%