2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bi-objective hybrid optimization algorithm to reduce noise and data dimension in diabetes diagnosis using support vector machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also in [18], Alirezaei et al proposed a wrapper-based method for feature selection using four meta-heuristic algorithms, namely, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), FA, PSO, and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA), with bi-objective fitness for reducing features dimensionality and improving classification accuracy in diabetes diagnosis. The SVM classifier achieved classification accuracies of 100%, 100%, 98.2%, and 94.6% when evaluating the features selected by FA, ICA, NSGA-II, and PSO, respectively, using the PIMA Indian Type-2 diabetes dataset obtained from UCI Machine Learning Datasets Repository.…”
Section: A Feature Selection/fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in [18], Alirezaei et al proposed a wrapper-based method for feature selection using four meta-heuristic algorithms, namely, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), FA, PSO, and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA), with bi-objective fitness for reducing features dimensionality and improving classification accuracy in diabetes diagnosis. The SVM classifier achieved classification accuracies of 100%, 100%, 98.2%, and 94.6% when evaluating the features selected by FA, ICA, NSGA-II, and PSO, respectively, using the PIMA Indian Type-2 diabetes dataset obtained from UCI Machine Learning Datasets Repository.…”
Section: A Feature Selection/fusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has less computational complexity, considers elitism, systematically preserves the diversity of Pareto-optimal solutions and adaptively handles the problem constraints (Deb and Jain, 2012). These features have made NSGA-II one of the most popular multi-objective optimisation algorithms in the literature with applications ranging from scheduling to diabetes diagnosis (Alirezaei et al, 2019). Different test problems from previous studies applying NSGA-II were compared in Deb et al (2002), showing that NSGA-II outperforms algorithms such as Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy (PAES) and Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm (SPEA) in obtaining a more diverse set of solutions.…”
Section: Solution Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, a non-dominant ranking genetic algorithm with elitism selection strategy was chosen to solve this problem. The high performance of the NSGA-II algorithm [41] in searching the Pareto solution depends on its evolution mechanism, which mainly includes fast non-dominant ranking, congestion distance, and an elitism selection strategy based on non-dominant ranking. In comparison with the other multi-objective algorithms, the NSGA-II algorithm has some advantages.…”
Section: Design Of the Solving Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%