2017
DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1354509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark study on the efficiency of unconstrained optimization algorithms in 2D-aerodynamic shape design

Abstract: Optimization algorithms are used in various engineering applications to identify optimal shapes. We benchmark several unconstrained optimization algorithms (Nelder-Mead, Quasi-Newton, steepest descent) under variation of gradient estimation schemes (adjoint approach, finite differences). Flow fields are computed by solving the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the open source computational fluid dynamics code OpenFOAM. Design variables vary from N = 2 to N = 364. The efficiency of the optimizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above work does not model the rotation, which is important to get the correct local angle of attack along the blade and thus accurately compute the forces acting on the blade. Several 3-D adjoint-based optimization efforts model rotation effects, three of which studied the NREL Phase VI rotor Dhert et al, 2017;Vorspel et al, 2018), and another which studied the MEXICO rotor (Tsiakas et al, 2018). Economon et al 2013used a continuous adjoint formulation to perform single-point aerodynamic shape optimization using a compressible RANS model.…”
Section: High-fidelity Cfd-based Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above work does not model the rotation, which is important to get the correct local angle of attack along the blade and thus accurately compute the forces acting on the blade. Several 3-D adjoint-based optimization efforts model rotation effects, three of which studied the NREL Phase VI rotor Dhert et al, 2017;Vorspel et al, 2018), and another which studied the MEXICO rotor (Tsiakas et al, 2018). Economon et al 2013used a continuous adjoint formulation to perform single-point aerodynamic shape optimization using a compressible RANS model.…”
Section: High-fidelity Cfd-based Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in stark contrast to the efforts using the adjoint method cited below, where up to several hundred design variables are commonly optimized. Interestingly, the findings by Lyu et al (2014) seem to resonate with more recent work from the wind energy community (Vorspel et al, 2017), and both works point to the use of the adjoint method for an efficient gradient computation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Something they expect to change for future rotating blades applications. The briefly cited benchmark paper by Vorspel et al (2017) is indeed also with OpenFOAM but it is kept in 2D. and Tsiakas et al (2018).…”
Section: High-fidelity Optimization Using the Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous work, the adjoint optimization in OpenFOAM has been tested against other optimization strategies, like finite differences and Nelder-Mead. The independence from the amount of design parameters was shown there, as well as the applicability for wind energy relevant profiles [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The definition of the rotor blade's shape can be done in various ways. It was shown in [17] that the free parametrization, i.e., all numerical grid points are design parameters, is not suitable for optimizing rotor blades. This results from large flow field gradients in the chordwise direction and in the spanwise direction, which transfer to the computed gradient.…”
Section: Gradient Projection and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%