2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia &Amp; Expo Workshops (ICMEW) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icmew46912.2020.9106041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Benchmark of Light Field View Interpolation Methods

Abstract: Light field view interpolation provides a solution that reduces the prohibitive size of a dense light field. This paper examines state-ofthe-art light field view interpolation methods with a comprehensive benchmark on challenging scenarios specific for interpolation tasks. Each method is analyzed in terms of their strengths and weaknesses in handling different challenges. We find that large disparities in a scene are the main source of challenge for the light field view interpolation methods. We also find that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most works on NVS methods and NVS benchmarks [MST*20; DBD*23; MSO*19; WPYS21; FBD*19; LGZ*20; AAB23] evaluate on sparse hold‐out views using image quality metrics [FTS*23; ANA*20; MDC*21b; SB13; LAK*16]. An exception is the Light Field Benchmark [YKB*20], where light field interpolation methods were evaluated on video sequences. On the contrary, our focus is on assessing the perceptual quality of NVS methods and evaluating how well current objective metrics can predict subjective quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most works on NVS methods and NVS benchmarks [MST*20; DBD*23; MSO*19; WPYS21; FBD*19; LGZ*20; AAB23] evaluate on sparse hold‐out views using image quality metrics [FTS*23; ANA*20; MDC*21b; SB13; LAK*16]. An exception is the Light Field Benchmark [YKB*20], where light field interpolation methods were evaluated on video sequences. On the contrary, our focus is on assessing the perceptual quality of NVS methods and evaluating how well current objective metrics can predict subjective quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These real world datasets assess performance under natural illumination and practical camera distortion. Also, we cross-validate the performance on a realworld gantry dataset [15].…”
Section: ) Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to the previous evaluations, we will now crossvalidate the performance of the proposed method on a dataset captured using a gantry-based acquisition method [15]. Moreover, we also compared our results with the lightfield view synthesis approach LLFF [45] which is based on multi-plane images (MPI).…”
Section: B Cross-validation On Gantry Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IBR methods synthesizing the novel views without explicitly modeling the scene depth [13,14], tend to fail with increasing baseline of the input views, whereas, depthbased methods can handle inputs with wider baseline (i.e. large disparities) [11,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%