2019
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-805-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark for testing the accuracy and computational cost of shortwave top-of-atmosphere reflectance calculations in clear-sky aerosol-laden atmospheres

Abstract: Abstract. Accurate calculations of shortwave reflectances in clear-sky aerosol-laden atmospheres are necessary for various applications in atmospheric sciences. However, computational cost becomes increasingly important for some applications such as data assimilation of top-of-atmosphere reflectances in models of atmospheric composition. This study aims to provide a benchmark that can help in assessing these two requirements in combination. We describe a protocol and input data for 44 080 cases involving vario… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tabulated results can be found for homogeneous atmospheres containing molecules only [12,34,35,36,37], for (in-) homogeneous atmospheres containing (molecules and) aerosols [38,39,40], and for homogeneous atmospheres consisting of cloud droplets [40]. However, while Escribano et al [41] do consider an ocean surface below an atmosphere for testbed results, there exist no such tables for the polarization of light computed for atmosphere-ocean system (AOS) models that include water-leaving radiance. Comparisons for polarized light computations using different RT codes have been reported for such models [42,43,44,45,46], but the results are drawn as a function of viewing angle which limits the accuracy that can be extracted to validate other RT codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabulated results can be found for homogeneous atmospheres containing molecules only [12,34,35,36,37], for (in-) homogeneous atmospheres containing (molecules and) aerosols [38,39,40], and for homogeneous atmospheres consisting of cloud droplets [40]. However, while Escribano et al [41] do consider an ocean surface below an atmosphere for testbed results, there exist no such tables for the polarization of light computed for atmosphere-ocean system (AOS) models that include water-leaving radiance. Comparisons for polarized light computations using different RT codes have been reported for such models [42,43,44,45,46], but the results are drawn as a function of viewing angle which limits the accuracy that can be extracted to validate other RT codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-stream source-function (TSSF; Toon et al, 1989) approach is used for thermal infrared radiances, and has also been applied to model passive microwave radiances, although such measurements are not used in this study. For solar wavelengths the Forward-Lobe Two-Stream Radiance Model (FLOTSAM; Escribano et al, 2019) is used, wherein forward scattered solar radiation either remains close to the angle of incidence (the narrow forward-lobe), or is scattered into the wide forward-lobe at angles around 15 • ; additional diffuse fluxes are calculated using the two-stream method, so FLOTSAM can be thought of as the equivalent of TSSF for solar wavelengths.…”
Section: Radiative Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manufacturer provides a software that allows to convert the obtained PSDs with PSLs to PSDs of spherical particles assuming 16 different refractive indices. We used this information, the information on the scattering angle, and the Lorenz-Mie code used in Escribano et al (2019) to infer a light spectrum that can best reproduce the software conversions between spherical aerosol types. Our optimization problem was constrained to fit a sum of Gaussian spectra over the wavelength domain.…”
Section: Size-resolved Dust Concentration Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%