2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benchmark dataset for canopy crown detection and delineation in co-registered airborne RGB, LiDAR and hyperspectral imagery from the National Ecological Observation Network

Abstract: Broad scale remote sensing promises to build forest inventories at unprecedented scales. A crucial step in this process is to associate sensor data into individual crowns. While dozens of crown detection algorithms have been proposed, their performance is typically not compared based on standard data or evaluation metrics. There is a need for a benchmark dataset to minimize differences in reported results as well as support evaluation of algorithms across a broad range of forest types. Combining RGB, LiDAR and… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research could also explore the utility of this product to inform structural metrics of fire severity [48,84,85] and ecosystem vulnerability under a range of stressors [86]. With the recent publication of open-source, multi-sensor (e.g., LiDAR, high-resolution hyperspectral imagery) benchmark datasets that include numerous forest types and structures [87] there are even more opportunities to evaluate existing algorithms on a standard dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research could also explore the utility of this product to inform structural metrics of fire severity [48,84,85] and ecosystem vulnerability under a range of stressors [86]. With the recent publication of open-source, multi-sensor (e.g., LiDAR, high-resolution hyperspectral imagery) benchmark datasets that include numerous forest types and structures [87] there are even more opportunities to evaluate existing algorithms on a standard dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of benchmarks, there had been timely limited comparisons of different methods on shared datasets in the past [20,22,23]. However, only recently, efforts were made for a curated, open, and long-term benchmark for individual tree detection in forests [107].…”
Section: Ground Truth Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many free, open‐source software tools exist for working with geospatial data products produced by UAS and NEON including QGIS (https://qgis.org/en/site/) for visualization and GUI‐based manipulation of raster and vector data types, CloudCompare (https://www.danielgm.net/cc/) for visualization and GUI‐based manipulation of point clouds, and a suite of packages (https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Spatial.html) for the R programming language (R Core Team, 2021). Several packages have also been developed specifically for working with NEON data, including neonUtilities (Lunch et al, 2021), neonhs (Joseph & Wasser, 2021), geoNEON (National Ecological Observatory Network, 2020), and NeonTreeEvaluation (Weinstein et al, 2021). A recent review by Atkins et al (2022) describes the ecosystem of R packages available for working with forestry data, many of which are relevant for the types of geospatial data produced by UAS and NEON.…”
Section: Core Principles For Uas/neon Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%