A benchmark analysis of the quality of distributed additive manufacturing centers

Abstract

PurposeNowadays, companies are increasingly adopting additive manufacturing (AM) technologies due to their flexibility and product customization, combined with non-dramatic increases in per unit cost. Moreover, many companies deploy a plurality of distributed AM centers to enhance flexibility and customer proximity. Although AM centers are characterized by similar equipment and working methods, their production mix and volumes may be variable. The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel methodology to (1) monitor the quality of the production of individual AM centers and (2) perform a benchmarking of different AM centers.Design/methodology/approachThis paper analyzes the quality of the production output of AM centers in terms of compliance with specifications. Quality is assessed through a multivariate statistical analysis of measurement data concerning several geometric quality characteristics. A novel operational methodology is suggested to estimate the fraction nonconforming of each AM center at three different levels: (1) overall production, (2) individual product typologies in the production mix and (3) individual quality characteristics.FindingsThe proposed methodology allows performing a benchmark analysis on the quality performance of distributed AM centers during regular production, without requiring any ad hoc experimental test.Originality/valueThis research assesses the capability of distributed AM centers to meet crucial quality requirements. The results can guide production managers toward improving the quality of the production of AM centers, in order to meet customer expectations and enhance business performance.

Effects of product complexity on human learning in assembly and disassembly operations

“…, 2015; Er and MacCarthy, 2006; Roy et al. , 2011; Verna and Maisano, 2022). In this environment, the role of learning in the context of product and process complexity becomes paramount to understand and manage effectively.…”

“…However, in the current era of mass customisation and personalisation, such an assumption is no longer valid. Given the need for operators to show flexibility in their tasks and adapt to changes, such as the introduction of new orders or product variants, the learning effect can no longer be neglected (Cheung et al, 2015;Er and MacCarthy, 2006;Roy et al, 2011;Verna and Maisano, 2022). In this environment, the role of learning in the context of product and process complexity becomes paramount to understand and manage effectively.…”

Prototype of hand prosthesis components manufactured with biocompatible material using PolyJet Matrix technology

“…Currently, manufacturing companies are adopting additive manufacturing due to their flexibility and product customization, combined with non-dramatic increases in per unit cost [1]. The components obtained through 3D printing technology are characterised by high anisotropy [2][3][4].…”

Analysing paradoxes in design decisions: the case of “multiple-district” paradox

“…This paradox is of potential interest even today, as it can occur in design problems involving distributed teams, whose local decisions should be merged into a single global decision [38]. Some practical examples concerning the Quality and Reliability field can be found in [56,58].…”