1975
DOI: 10.1016/0003-3472(75)90145-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A behavioural comparison of domestic and mallard ducks. Habituation and flight reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex differences in habituation have previously been found in the domestic Aylesbury duck, where females habituated faster to a novel stimulus in their pen than males (Desforges and Wood-Gush, 1975), and in yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes), where females showed a higher habituation potential to repeated approaches by a single person (Ellenberg et al, 2009). More generally, sex differences in learning are not unusual, and are often explained by motivational differences between the sexes because of different requirements for reproductive success (Reader and Laland, 2000;Lonsdorf et al, 2004;Lonsdorf, 2005).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Habituationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Sex differences in habituation have previously been found in the domestic Aylesbury duck, where females habituated faster to a novel stimulus in their pen than males (Desforges and Wood-Gush, 1975), and in yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes), where females showed a higher habituation potential to repeated approaches by a single person (Ellenberg et al, 2009). More generally, sex differences in learning are not unusual, and are often explained by motivational differences between the sexes because of different requirements for reproductive success (Reader and Laland, 2000;Lonsdorf et al, 2004;Lonsdorf, 2005).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Habituationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, a change in genetic structure over time in farmed mallards is consistent with Lynch and O'Hely (2001), who argued that adaptation to captivity together with anthropogenic selection at breeding facilities will inevitably lead to a genetic alteration of the captive population. Such differences in genetics may, at least partly, explain discrepancies documented in captive ducks regarding morphology, e.g., brain volume (Guay and Iwaniuk 2008), digestive organs (Champagnon et al 2012b;Moore and Battley 2006), feeding apparatus Söderquist et al 2014), sexual behavior (Desforges and Wood-Gush 1976), mate preferences (Cheng et al 1978;Cheng et al 1979), and habituation to humans (Desforges and Wood-Gush 1975).…”
Section: Genetic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we hypothesize that more social individuals are more proactive than reactive, and hence less prone to habituation according to the predictions of the proactivity -reactivity gradient. Finally, previous research in birds [17,30] showed that females habituate faster than males. Thus, we also assessed this sex effect in our lizard study system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%