2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A behavioral economics intervention to encourage epinephrine-carrying among food-allergic adults: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Middle‐ and high‐school are periods when school supports are particularly crucial to protect against adolescent impulsivity, peer approval‐seeking, and risk‐taking, especially given that students are less likely to have emergency action plans in place after the fifth grade . Preliminary evidence suggests that behavioral economics approaches, including text message prompts and financial incentives, may help students more safely manage their allergies. However, the literature currently lacks policy implementation studies demonstrating effective institutional approaches to food allergy management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle‐ and high‐school are periods when school supports are particularly crucial to protect against adolescent impulsivity, peer approval‐seeking, and risk‐taking, especially given that students are less likely to have emergency action plans in place after the fifth grade . Preliminary evidence suggests that behavioral economics approaches, including text message prompts and financial incentives, may help students more safely manage their allergies. However, the literature currently lacks policy implementation studies demonstrating effective institutional approaches to food allergy management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, broader details on the platform were not well detailed [22]. Beyond summative evaluations, qualitative studies have sought to explore user perceptions of mobile tools and/or health information messaging programs in the US [23, 24], New Zealand [25], and India [26–29]. However, none of these present quantitiative data on the technological performance of the program; instead focusing on reported perceptions of the technology, including feasibility, usability and/or acceptability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unclear whether providing people at risk of anaphylaxis with financial incentives increases how often they carry autoinjectors because the certainty of evidence is very low (Appendix b). One trial in people aged 18 to 30 years found that financial incentives were associated with a 27% mean increase in the proportion of people carrying their autoinjector (statistically significant, CI not reported, very low certainty) 69 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%