A beginner's guide to study extracellular vesicles in human blood plasma and serum
Rienk Nieuwland,
Pia R‐M Siljander
Abstract:Blood is the most commonly used body fluid for obtaining and studying extracellular vesicles (EVs). While blood is a standard choice for clinical analysis, using blood as a source of EVs introduces multiple layers of complexity. At the Blood Extracellular Vesicle Workshop organized by the International Society for Extracellular Vesicles in Helsinki (2022), it became evident that beginner researchers lack trustworthy information on how to initiate their research and avoid common pitfalls. This educational guide… Show more
“…S4 ). Images obtained from peritoneum also show higher density of EVs in line with extracellular vesicles being with only a small fraction of all particles present in blood 30 . Figure 1 Quantification of the concentration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and identification of their cellular markers during homeostasis and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation ( i.p.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1 a). It might be peritoneal lavage contains also EVs released by abdominal organs whereas EVs are only one group of molecules present in blood 30 . Morphology and size of EVs in each body fluid was confirmed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM).…”
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are pivotal bioactive structures involved in various processes including inflammation. Herein we report the interactions between EVs and NETs during murine endotoxemia studied in situ directly in the vasculature (cremaster muscle, liver sinusoids) using intravital microscopy (IVM). We captured NETs and EV release in real time by both non- and polarized neutrophils in liver but not in cremaster vasculature. When comparing numbers of circulating EVs of various origin (nanoparticle tracking analysis—NTA, flow cytometry) with those interacting with endothelium and NETs (IVM) we observed that whereas platelet and monocyte/macrophage-derived EVs dominate in blood and peritoneal lavage, respectively, mostly neutrophil-derived EVs interact with the vascular lining, NETs and leukocytes. Despite the interaction, NETs do not affect EV formation as NET release inhibition did not alter EV release. However, EVs inhibit NETs formation and in particular, erythrocyte-derived EVs downregulate NET release and this effect is mediated via Siglec-E-dependent interactions with neutrophils. Overall, we report that EVs are present in NETs in vivo and they do modulate their release but the process in not bidirectional. Moreover, EVs isolated from body fluids might not reflect their importance in direct endothelial- and leukocyte-related interactions.
“…S4 ). Images obtained from peritoneum also show higher density of EVs in line with extracellular vesicles being with only a small fraction of all particles present in blood 30 . Figure 1 Quantification of the concentration of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and identification of their cellular markers during homeostasis and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced systemic inflammation ( i.p.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1 a). It might be peritoneal lavage contains also EVs released by abdominal organs whereas EVs are only one group of molecules present in blood 30 . Morphology and size of EVs in each body fluid was confirmed with transmission electron microscopy (TEM).…”
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are pivotal bioactive structures involved in various processes including inflammation. Herein we report the interactions between EVs and NETs during murine endotoxemia studied in situ directly in the vasculature (cremaster muscle, liver sinusoids) using intravital microscopy (IVM). We captured NETs and EV release in real time by both non- and polarized neutrophils in liver but not in cremaster vasculature. When comparing numbers of circulating EVs of various origin (nanoparticle tracking analysis—NTA, flow cytometry) with those interacting with endothelium and NETs (IVM) we observed that whereas platelet and monocyte/macrophage-derived EVs dominate in blood and peritoneal lavage, respectively, mostly neutrophil-derived EVs interact with the vascular lining, NETs and leukocytes. Despite the interaction, NETs do not affect EV formation as NET release inhibition did not alter EV release. However, EVs inhibit NETs formation and in particular, erythrocyte-derived EVs downregulate NET release and this effect is mediated via Siglec-E-dependent interactions with neutrophils. Overall, we report that EVs are present in NETs in vivo and they do modulate their release but the process in not bidirectional. Moreover, EVs isolated from body fluids might not reflect their importance in direct endothelial- and leukocyte-related interactions.
“…EVs are released into the peripheral circulatory system directly from the cell surface plasma membrane or from the fusion of intracellular multivesicular bodies with the cell surface membrane [ 54 ]. EVs’ ability to merge with and release their contents into cells that are different from their source cells, as well as their potential to affect processes in the recipient cells by transferring their protein or coding and non-coding RNA cargo including miRNAs, have been the subject of extensive research by many researchers [ 14 , 55 , 56 , 57 ].…”
The risk of developing pulmonary hypertension (PH) in people living with HIV is at least 300-fold higher than in the general population, and illicit drug use further potentiates the development of HIV-associated PH. The relevance of extracellular vesicles (EVs) containing both coding as well as non-coding RNAs in PH secondary to HIV infection and drug abuse is yet to be explored. We here compared the miRNA cargo of plasma-derived EVs from HIV-infected stimulant users with (HIV + Stimulants + PH) and without PH (HIV + Stimulants) using small RNA sequencing. The data were compared with 12 PH datasets available in the GEO database to identify potential candidate gene targets for differentially altered miRNAs using the following functional analysis tools: ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), over-representation analysis (ORA), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). MiRNAs involved in promoting cell proliferation and inhibition of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathways were among the top upregulated miRNAs identified in EVs from the HIV + Stimulants + PH group compared to the HIV + Stimulants group. Alternatively, the downregulated miRNAs in the HIV + Stimulants + PH group suggested an association with the negative regulation of smooth muscle cell proliferation, IL-2 mediated signaling, and transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. The validation of significantly differentially expressed miRNAs in an independent set of HIV-infected (cocaine users and nondrug users) with and without PH confirmed the upregulation of miR-32-5p, 92-b-3p, and 301a-3p positively regulating cellular proliferation and downregulation of miR-5571, -4670 negatively regulating smooth muscle proliferation in EVs from HIV-PH patients. This increase in miR-301a-3p and decrease in miR-4670 were negatively correlated with the CD4 count and FEV1/FVC ratio, and positively correlated with viral load. Collectively, this data suggest the association of alterations in the miRNA cargo of circulating EVs with HIV-PH.
“…The methodology employed in this article was devised and executed in accordance with the 2018 guideline, while the terminology adhered to the 2023 guideline. Furthermore, there are additional valuable resources for handling EVs, sourced from reputable references [20,21].…”
The technical difficulty of separating extracellular vesicles (EVs) from plasma proteins in human blood presents a significant hurdle in EV research, particularly during nano ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometric (UHPLC-MS/MS) analysis, where detecting “vesicular” proteins among abundant plasma proteins is challenging. Standardisation is a pressing issue in EV research, prompting collaborative global efforts to address it. While the MISEV guidelines offer valuable recommendations, unanswered questions remain, particularly regarding sample storage. We compared size exclusion chromatography (SEC) columns with pore sizes of 35 nm and 70 nm to identify fractions with minimal contaminating proteins and the highest concentration of small EVs (sEVs). Following column selection, we explored potential differences in the quality and quantity of sEVs isolated from platelet-free plasma (PFP) after long-term storage at −80 °C (>2.5 years) compared to freshly drawn blood. Our methodologically rigorous study indicates that prolonged storage, under correct storage and processing conditions, does not compromise sEV quality. Both columns effectively isolated vesicles, with the 70 nm column exhibiting a higher abundance of “vesicular” proteins. We propose a relatively rapid and moderately efficient protocol for obtaining a comparatively pure sEV fraction from plasma, facilitating sEV processing in clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
