2016
DOI: 10.1118/1.4948671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A beam hardening and dispersion correction for x‐ray dark‐field radiography

Abstract: The authors show that the influence of and dispersion can be quantified by simulation and, thus, measured image data can be corrected. The simulation allows to determine the corresponding dark-field artifacts for a wide range of setup parameters, like tube-voltage and filtration. The application of the proposed method to mammographic dark-field data shows an increase in contrast compared to the original image, which might simplify a further image-based diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A method for correcting this effect, similar to the one presented by Pelzer et al . 32 , was applied. Lastly, dark-field radiographs were low-pass filtered by convolution with a 2D Gaussian kernel ( σ = 3.2 px).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A method for correcting this effect, similar to the one presented by Pelzer et al . 32 , was applied. Lastly, dark-field radiographs were low-pass filtered by convolution with a 2D Gaussian kernel ( σ = 3.2 px).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimate for ν BH was calculated from X-ray transmittance with an algorithm similar to the one presented by Pelzer et al . 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the visibility still changes when measuring a highly attenuating sample like a thorax due to an unavoidable energy dependency of the grating interferometer. Consequently, to account for beam hardening in the measured XDF signal, calibration is conducted prior to the measurements 29, 30 with different equivalent attenuators made of polyoxymethylene (POM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, besides small-angle scatter due to electron density fluctuations in the sample, secondary effects such as beam-hardening and Compton scatter may lead to a reduction in visibility [40]. A correction was therefore applied to the acquired visibility reduction values, using a method closely resembling the one presented in [41]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%