2022
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bead-based GPCR phosphorylation immunoassay for high-throughput ligand profiling and GRK inhibitor screening

Abstract: Analysis of agonist-driven phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can provide valuable insights into the receptor activation state and ligand pharmacology. However, to date, assessment of GPCR phosphorylation using high-throughput applications has been challenging. We have developed and validated a bead-based immunoassay for the quantitative assessment of agonist-induced GPCR phosphorylation that can be performed entirely in multiwell cell culture plates. The assay involves immunoprecipitation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, increasing evidence is starting to suggest that GRK5/6 tend to phosphorylate sites “proximal” to the plasma membrane within the C-terminus of a GPCR, while GRK2/3 are able to phosphorylate more “distal” sites (Kaufmann et al, 2022). Our data agrees with this “geometric” model, with Thr 370 and Ser 375 being “proximal” while Thr 376 and Thr 379 would be the “distal”, GRK2/3 sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, increasing evidence is starting to suggest that GRK5/6 tend to phosphorylate sites “proximal” to the plasma membrane within the C-terminus of a GPCR, while GRK2/3 are able to phosphorylate more “distal” sites (Kaufmann et al, 2022). Our data agrees with this “geometric” model, with Thr 370 and Ser 375 being “proximal” while Thr 376 and Thr 379 would be the “distal”, GRK2/3 sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PierceTM HA epitope tag antibody was obtained from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). The rabbit polyclonal phosphosite-specific µ-opioid receptor antibodies anti-pT370 (7TM0319B), anti-pT376 (7TM0319D), anti-pT379 (7TM0319E), anti-pS375 (7TM0319C) and anti-HA antibody (7TM000HA) were obtained from 7TM Antibodies (Jena, Germany) (Kaufmann et al, 2022). The secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked anti-rabbit antibody was purchased from Cell Signaling (Frankfurt, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of genome-edited cell lines lacking expression of one or more of the ubiquitously expressed GRK isoforms, GRK2, GRK3, GRK5, and GRK6 ( 13 ), also offers new approaches to functional reconstitution and definition of GRK selectivity. In addition, the development of both selective small molecule GRK inhibitors ( 14 , 18 ) and similarly, the development of phospho-site–specific antisera that detect sites of regulated or constitutive phosphorylation within GPCRs ( 5 , 6 , 9 , 27 , 28 ) have been providing new insights.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS1 spectra were taken from 100 to 1700 m/z using a TIMS-TOF Pro Q-TOF (Bruker Daltonics) operating in PASEF mode 26 with an ion mobility range (1/k 0 ) of 0.60−1.60 Vs/cm 2 . For tandem MS, the following parameters were used: number of PASEF MS/MS scans (10); total cycle time (1.16 s); target intensity (20 000); intensity threshold (2500); charge range (0−5); isolation width (2 m/z for m/z < 700 and 3 m/z for m/z > 700); collisional energy (20−59 eV). Precursor ions were excluded within a 0.4 min window and reconsidered if the intensity was 4-fold higher than the previous selection.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques for probing GPCR phosphorylation include site-directed mutagenesis (Ser/Thr → Ala to eliminate potential phosphorylation sites; Ser/Thr → Glu to mimic phosphorylation in an immutable form), 32 P labeling, and use of phosphorylation-specific antibodies. , Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis has emerged as a powerful approach for determining the locations and abundances of phosphorylation sites. This technique does not require prior knowledge of sites, in contrast to mutagenesis or antibody-based strategies. However, identifying phosphorylation sites within membrane proteins such as GPCRs via MS is challenging, because of protein size, low abundance, and hydrophobicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%