2008
DOI: 10.1109/tnn.2007.915107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Perspective on Stochastic Neurocontrol

Abstract: Control design for stochastic uncertain nonlinear systems is traditionally based on minimizing the expected value of a suitably chosen loss function. Moreover, most control methods usually assume the certainty equivalence principle to simplify the problem and make it computationally tractable. We offer an improved probabilistic framework which is not constrained by these previous assumptions, and provides a more natural framework for incorporating and dealing with uncertainty. The focus of this paper is on dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantage of the FPD is that it provides an explicit form of the randomised optimal controller. However, since the evaluation of the randomised optimal controller involves multivariate integration steps, as can be seen from (1), which needs to be computed by backward recursion the problem renders to be nontrivial and computationally very intensive. To overcome the difficulties arising in the FPD, a probabilistic Dual Heuristic Programming (DHP) adaptive critic method was proposed in [8,9].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the FPD is that it provides an explicit form of the randomised optimal controller. However, since the evaluation of the randomised optimal controller involves multivariate integration steps, as can be seen from (1), which needs to be computed by backward recursion the problem renders to be nontrivial and computationally very intensive. To overcome the difficulties arising in the FPD, a probabilistic Dual Heuristic Programming (DHP) adaptive critic method was proposed in [8,9].…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in most control applications it is practically impossible to obtain an accurate mathematical model of the dynamics. Therefore, researchers have recently considered modeling the conditional distributions of the stochastic systems rather than relying on the single estimate of their parameters [8], [14].…”
Section: Conditional Distribution Of Linear Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However deriving the control law based on heuristic certainty equivalence (HCE) control principle has been shown to lead to an inadequate transient response because of the initial uncertainty involved in the unknown parameters [8], [14]. The optimal control of linear systems with uncertain parameters and quadratic cost functions has then been formulated in the context of guaranteed cost control [4], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, several groups of control methods have been developed. Examples of the so far developed groups of control methods are: 1) stochastic distribution control, which is concerned with the problem of designing a controller so that the pdf of the system output follows a pre-specified ideal distribution (Wang and Afshar, 2009); 2) closed loop pdf control (Kárný, 1996;Kárný and Guy, 2006), where the selected control influences the closed loop description of the system under consideration; and 3) the control of the tracking error pdf (Herzallah and Lowe, 2008). This paper is concerned with extending the second group of control methods, known as fully probabilistic design (FPD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%