2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.15.950873
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian nonparametric approach to super-resolution single-molecule localization

Abstract: We consider the problem of single-molecule identification in superresolution microscopy. Super-resolution microscopy overcomes the diffraction limit by localizing individual fluorescing molecules in a field of view. This is particularly difficult since each individual molecule appears and disappears randomly across time and because the total number of molecules in the field of view is unknown. Additionally, data sets acquired with super-resolution microscopes can contain a large number of spurious fluorescent … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a collapsed state formulation (one that keeps track of the total population of decreasing numbers of fluorophores) can be used [ 15 , 25 , 26 ]. However, even then, existing methods for enumeration do not sample full Bayesian posteriors and counting would not be possible for cases where the majority of fluorophores are initially inactive such as in the case of photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM) [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 11 ]. Indeed, moving forward, PALM and other superresolution experiments [ 4 , 5 ] could provide exciting in vivo test beds for our method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, a collapsed state formulation (one that keeps track of the total population of decreasing numbers of fluorophores) can be used [ 15 , 25 , 26 ]. However, even then, existing methods for enumeration do not sample full Bayesian posteriors and counting would not be possible for cases where the majority of fluorophores are initially inactive such as in the case of photoactivation localization microscopy (PALM) [ 57 , 58 , 59 , 11 ]. Indeed, moving forward, PALM and other superresolution experiments [ 4 , 5 ] could provide exciting in vivo test beds for our method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Directly enumerating fluorophores and tracking their photophysical dynamics by discriminating between them on the basis of their physical location [ 11 ] is often impossible as typically an entire bright spot lies below the diffraction limit [ 2 , 3 ]. Furthermore, fluorescence ruler methods, which enumerate fluorophores across time by comparing the brightness of a region of interest (ROI) to the brightness of a known calibration standard, are unreliable when the number of fluorophores is large on account of the inherent uncertainty introduced by photon shot noise which increases with growing fluorophore numbers [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, all prior methods provide a single estimate of molecular count, whereas a probabilis-tic method would provide valuable information for downstream analysis. Bayesian approaches can estimate a likelihood for each possible condition and have previously been used to infer the number of FRET conformational states [30,31], the number of photobleaching steps [19], the assignment of blinking events to specific fluorophores [32,33], and the molecular count from observed intensity [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%