2013
DOI: 10.4081/gh.2013.57
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian kriging model for estimating residential exposure to air pollution of children living in a high-risk area in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To give a map representation of PM 10 from monitoring stations, we applied a geostatistical interpolated method (Empirical Bayesian kriging) that expands the monitor PM 10 point observations to the whole Lombardy territory (Figure 3A) [62].
Figure 3 Graphical representation of PM 10 concentration levels.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give a map representation of PM 10 from monitoring stations, we applied a geostatistical interpolated method (Empirical Bayesian kriging) that expands the monitor PM 10 point observations to the whole Lombardy territory (Figure 3A) [62].
Figure 3 Graphical representation of PM 10 concentration levels.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, a dense air pollution monitoring network must be employed if conventional geostatistical techniques are to be used. This is rarely available in urban areas [102][103][104][105], and interpolation using an inadequate number of monitoring stations can lead to highly biased and smoothed results [89,100].…”
Section: Spatial Prediction (Spatial Distribution) Of Pm 10 In Urban mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the number of published applications of Kriging on spatial prediction of air pollutants is relatively low [100,105].…”
Section: Spatial Prediction (Spatial Distribution) Of Pm 10 In Urban mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we focused on environmental statistics with the aim of estimating the concentration surface and related uncertainty of an air pollutant from air quality data recorded by a network of monitoring stations. We did so within a Bayesian framework to overcome difficulties in measuring prediction uncertainty (Diggle et al, 1998;Pilz and Spöck, 2008;Vicedo-Cabrera et al, 2013;Cecconi et al, 2016), which are usual when land-use regression (Hoek et al, 2008) or ordinary Kriging (Banerjee et al, 2004;Son et al, 2010) are used. However, it is important to acknowledge that, alternatively to statistical approaches, deterministic models based on emissions meteorology and chemico-physical characteristics of the atmosphere are of great value [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%