2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-012-0234-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian hierarchical model for assessing the impact of human activity on nitrogen dioxide concentrations in Europe

Abstract: Ambient concentrations of many pollutants are associated with emissions due to human activity, such as road transport and other combustion sources. In this paper we consider air pollution as a multilevel phenomenon within a Bayesian hierarchical model. We examine different scales of variation in pollution concentrations ranging from large scale transboundary effects to more localised effects which are directly related to human activity. Specifically, in the first stage of the model, we isolate underlying patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar comparison for our best model for NO 2 shows the RMSPE value of 17.65 which is relative to the overall data standard deviation of 37.19 as reported in Table 2 here. Thus our model has much lower relative root-mean-square error, compared with the standard deviation of the full data, than what was reported in Shaddick et al (2013). For PM 10 , modelled annual mean data from 52 monitoring sites in London and their best land use regression model, PMLUR, reported an R 2 -value of 0.58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A similar comparison for our best model for NO 2 shows the RMSPE value of 17.65 which is relative to the overall data standard deviation of 37.19 as reported in Table 2 here. Thus our model has much lower relative root-mean-square error, compared with the standard deviation of the full data, than what was reported in Shaddick et al (2013). For PM 10 , modelled annual mean data from 52 monitoring sites in London and their best land use regression model, PMLUR, reported an R 2 -value of 0.58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Thus our model has much lower relative root‐mean‐square error, compared with the standard deviation of the full data, than what was reported in Shaddick et al . (). For PM 10 , Gulliver et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…() compare six models for PM 10 in Piedmont (Italy), featuring different levels of complexity either in the hierarchical structure or in the spatio‐temporal covariance function. Moreover, univariate spatio‐temporal hierarchical models were proposed to account for rural/background and urban/suburban random effects on PM 10 concentrations (Sahu et al ., ), to combine monitoring data and the output from a local‐scale air pollution model for health risk assessment (Pirani et al ., ) and to assess the effects of human activity on nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) pollution in European urban areas (Shaddick et al ., ), to mention a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%